It'd all get used up and life would cease.
If carbon was not recycled, it would accumulate in the atmosphere and disrupt the carbon cycle. This accumulation could lead to an increase in greenhouse gases, contributing to global warming and climate change. Additionally, the lack of carbon recycling could disrupt ecosystems and hinder the growth of plants, which rely on carbon as a key component for photosynthesis.
Photosynthesis and respiration are the two cellular processes involved in the oxygen carbon cycle. During photosynthesis, plants take in carbon dioxide and release oxygen, while during respiration plants and animals take in oxygen and release carbon dioxide.
Like any other hydrocarbons, benzene and methylbenzene burn in a plentiful supply of oxygen to give carbon dioxide, water and oxygen my guess would be that if you didnt have enough in the first place nothing would happen becuase the eqaution of combustion has to be ballance so if thers 2 h2o there has to be to of everthing else or nothing would happen
Plants absorb CO2, break it apart and release the oxygen in a process known as photosynthesis. Without CO2 plants would die, releasing CO2. Balance would eventually be restored, though it might require several thousand years and a loss of significant forest or marine cyanobacteria. 2nd Answer: Great answer! Also, if there were no carbon dioxide and other "greenhouse" gases, the Earth would become a deep freeze, and life would mostly cease to exist. We owe our survival on the greenhouse gases to hold in some of the Sun's heat that hits the Earth every day, all day, thus keeping the air temperature close to the same temperature year 'round. (If you consider, "HOT hot and COLD cold", our winter and summer temperatures are close, indeed.
A terrarium with live plants would be able to continuously cycle oxygen (O2) and carbon dioxide (CO2) gases. The plants use CO2 during photosynthesis and release oxygen as a byproduct, creating a cyclical process where oxygen is replenished and carbon dioxide is removed from the air.
In the absence of decomposers from carbon cycle heaps of organic matter will accumulate. This will ultimately disturb the natural balance.
Dead material would accumulate to choke out livable habitat. Basically, there would be dead organisms and animal waste piled up everywhere!
we would die
You would die
you would blow up
what would happen if the 8th amendment didn't exist
Every living organism is related to the Carbon Cycle. Herbivores would be related to the carbon cycle because they breathe in air, and breathe out carbon dioxide (CO2).
we have freedom
?
No, removing animals from the carbon cycle would not stop the cycle. While animals play a role in the carbon cycle through respiration and decomposition, the cycle would continue through other processes such as photosynthesis by plants, decomposition by microorganisms, and geological processes.
There would be no water cycle.
There Would No longer Be a Rock Cycle :(