answersLogoWhite

0

This indication is in parenthesis, with Latin numerals: Fe(II), Fe(III).

User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

When naming a transition metal ion that can hace more than one common ionic charge the numerical value of the charge is indicated by a?

Because transition metals can assume more than one charge, the transition metal ion is named by using a Roman numeral


When naming an ion of a transition metal that can have more then one possible ionic charge the numerical value of the charge is indicated by a?

Roman numeral placed in parentheses after the name of the transition metal.


When naming a transition metal ion that can have more than one common ionic charge the numerical value of the charge is indicated by a?

Roman numerals are used: I, II, III.


When naming a transition metal ion that can have more than one common ionic charge the numeric value of the charge is indicated by what?

The numeric value of the charge for a transition metal ion is indicated by Roman numerals in parentheses following the metal ion's name. For example, iron (II) and iron (III) represent the +2 and +3 charges of iron, respectively.


When naming a transition metal ion that can have more than one common ionic charge the numerical value of the charge is indicated by a .?

Roman numerals are used: I, II, III.


How are oxidation states of transition metals indicated in the names of metal compounds?

Roman numerals are used to indicate oxidation states.


When we are naming transition metal why do we need to write a Roman numeral in the middle?

Roman numerals are used in the naming of transition metals to indicate the oxidation state of the metal in a compound. Transition metals can have multiple oxidation states, and the numeral specifies which one is present in that particular compound. For example, in iron(III) chloride, the Roman numeral III indicates that iron has a +3 charge. This helps avoid ambiguity and provides clarity in chemical nomenclature.


When we are naming elements with a transition metal why do we need to write a Roman numeral in the middle?

When naming compounds that include transition metals, a Roman numeral is used to indicate the oxidation state or charge of the metal ion. This is necessary because transition metals can have multiple oxidation states, and the Roman numeral helps to specify which one is present in the compound. For example, in iron(III) chloride, the Roman numeral III indicates that iron has a +3 charge. This distinction is crucial for accurately conveying the compound's chemical composition and properties.


What are the rules for naming polyatomic compounds that are transition metals?

Since these compounds include metals, it is automatically ionic. Since it is ionic, the names are determined by simply setting the names of the ions together. Since many of the transition metals have different charges, the latin form of that metal is used, with a suffix changing with the strenght of the metallic ion. -ous refers to a weaker charge than -ic For example: Cupric oxide has Cu with a charge of 2+ and Oxygen with a charge of 2- whilte Cuprous oxide has 2 Cu atoms with a charge of 1+ and 1 Oxygen atom with a charge of 2- Alternatively, You can write the metals English name with the charge in parentheses, like thus: Copper (II) Oxide


Naming system that uses roman numerals to show charge on metals?

stocksystem


When naming a transition metal that has more than one oxidation number the numeric value of the oxidation number is indicated by a?

Roman Numeral


What is the numerical value of the charge indicated by when naming a transition metal ion that can have more than one common ionic charge?

When naming a transition metal ion that can have more than one common ionic charge, the numerical value of charge is indicated by either (i) the charge number in capital Roman numerals within parentheses after the cation name or (ii) a distinct form of the cation name, ending in "ic" for the higher ionic charge or "ous" for the lower ionic charge. Method (i) is usually preferred now, but method (ii) was often used fifty years ago and is sometimes still used.