The relative strength of bonds is:
Covalent > Ionic > Metallic > Hydrogen Bonding > Van der Walls Dispersion Forces
This is only a general, as there are ionic substances that are quite strong, and relatively weak covalent substances. The strongest substances are network covalent, which includes diamond and, strangely enough, graphite.
lie in general the ionic bonds are stronger than covalent bonds
The answer is no. If you are comparing them with covalent or metallic bonds, then covalent is the strongest in general. There are, obviously, exceptions, but in general ionic bonds are easier to break than covalent bonds.
FeNi is an intermetallic compound with a metallic bond. In this case, the bond between iron (Fe) and nickel (Ni) is considered metallic rather than ionic or covalent.
No. A bond cannot be both covalent and ionic. A bond can be covalent, ionic or metallic. In covalent bonding electrons are shared, electrons are transferred in ionic bonding and electrons move about in a sea of electrons in metallic bonds.
Ionic bonds are generally stronger than covalent bonds. Ionic bonds are formed between ions with opposite charges, resulting in a strong electrostatic attraction. Covalent bonds involve the sharing of electrons between atoms, which are generally not as strong as the electrostatic forces in ionic bonds.
Gold's chemical bond type is metallic, not covalent or ionic. In metallic bonding, electrons are delocalized and free to move throughout the material, creating properties such as malleability and high thermal and electrical conductivity typical of metals like gold.
The answer is no. If you are comparing them with covalent or metallic bonds, then covalent is the strongest in general. There are, obviously, exceptions, but in general ionic bonds are easier to break than covalent bonds.
The ionic bond is the strongest followed by covalent, metallic, Van der Waals.
Covalent, Ionic and Metallic bond
FeNi is an intermetallic compound with a metallic bond. In this case, the bond between iron (Fe) and nickel (Ni) is considered metallic rather than ionic or covalent.
No. A bond cannot be both covalent and ionic. A bond can be covalent, ionic or metallic. In covalent bonding electrons are shared, electrons are transferred in ionic bonding and electrons move about in a sea of electrons in metallic bonds.
Ionic bonds are generally stronger than covalent bonds. Ionic bonds are formed between ions with opposite charges, resulting in a strong electrostatic attraction. Covalent bonds involve the sharing of electrons between atoms, which are generally not as strong as the electrostatic forces in ionic bonds.
Types of intramolecular bonds: ionic, covalent, metallic.
ICl3 is covalent N2O is covalent LiCl is ionic
metallic bond is present in KCL because all metal have metallic bond.
ionic bond covalent bond metallic bond coordinate bond
Copper Chloride is an ionic bond. So, no. It isn't a covalent bond. :)
ionic bond covalent bond metallic bond coordinate bond