Uranium is already radioactive, it does notbecome radioactive in a reactor. Uranium naturally undergoes alpha decay, emitting alpha particles and transforming to Thorium, another radioactive element. The radioactive decay of these daughter isotopes continues via either alpha or beta decay until a stable isotope of lead is produced.
Perhaps what you meant to ask is "Why does Uranium fission in a nuclear reactor?".
This is because there are low energy neutrons (aka thermal neutrons) in the reactor that can avoid capture by the plentiful Uranium-238 isotope and fission the rare Uranium-235 isotope. Initially when the reactor is being started these thermal neutrons are provided by a device called a neutron source. When the reactor becomes critical (by the operators gradually removing control rods) it sustains a stable fission neutron chain reaction supplying its own neutrons to keep fissioning at a constant rate. The operators then remove the neutron source, as it is no longer needed. The only problem in keeping this chain reaction going is that Uranium-235 fission emits high energy neutrons (aka fast neutrons) which are readily captured by the plentiful Uranium-238 isotope. This problem is solved by a moderator, a substance that rapidly removes energy from the neutrons (slowing them from fast to thermal speeds) before a significant number can be lost in Uranium-238 neutron capture. Typical moderators are: graphite, water, heavy water, hydrocarbons, etc.
Perhaps what you meant to ask is "Why do Uranium fuel rods become more radioactive in a nuclear reactor?".
The fuel rods become more radioactive in the reactor than they were originally because of the highly radioactive fission product isotopes produced by the Uranium-235 fission (as well as radioactive isotopes produced by neutron capture by stable elements in the structural parts of the fuel rods). These isotopes are more dangerous than the original Uranium was, because they undergo beta and gamma decay, emitting beta particles and gamma rays both of which are more penetrating than than alpha particles are. Also the longer the fuel rods remain in the reactor the more of these fission products build up in the fuel rods. The good thing is these fission products have much shorter halflifes than the original Uranium: they decay rapidly to stable non-radioactive elements.
The original Uranium takes billions of years to decay completely to stable lead. The fission products take from hours to centuries to decay completely to stable isotopes. The slowest to decay is gone in about 250 years. Thus, after the decay period the fuel rods are actually less radioactive than they were originally before being put in the reactor. The reactor "burned up" the Uranium, leaving fission product "ashes" which take a few centuries to "cool" completely.
You might ask now "What becomes of the Uranium-238 that captured neutrons during the neutron chain reaction in a nuclear reactor?".
It becomes Plutonium, some of which the reactor "burns" just like the Uranium-235 and some builds up in the fuel rods (like the fission products do). This Plutonium could be reprocessed(along with unused Uranium) to make new fuel rods, but if not, with a halfllife of about 25,000 years it will take about 125,000 years in storage to completely decay back to Uranium via alpha decay, which as I said already takes billions of years to decay to stable lead isotopes.
Nuclear energy produces wastes in the form of spent nuclear fuels, which are a mixture of radioactive isotopes and heavy metals - both of which are toxic - and irradiated materials surrounding the reactor which become radioactive from exposure to the radiation produced by the reactor and which must be disposed of at the end of the life of the reactor. Note that breeder reactors - which are not permitted in the USA - convert some of the otherwise unusable radioactive isotopes into fissionable isotopes, thus allowing more of the fuel to be used and reducing amount of fuel rod waste (with the rods being re-processed to recover more usable fuel rather than just disposed of).
Helium is used as a coolant in nuclear gas reactors because it is chemically inert, meaning it does not react with other materials in the reactor. It has high thermal conductivity, which helps in transferring heat away from the reactor core efficiently. Helium also has low neutron capture cross-section, making it less likely to absorb neutrons and become radioactive.
Uranium does not become a fossil fuel because it is a radioactive element used in nuclear power plants to generate electricity. Fossil fuels like coal, oil, and natural gas are formed from organic matter over millions of years through a process called fossilization.
No, uranium will not become iron. Uranium is a radioactive element that will not naturally transform into iron. Iron is a different element and the two elements do not undergo a natural transformation process from one to the other.
Plutonium-239 is produced in a breeder reactor when uranium-238 absorbs a neutron and undergoes two beta decays to become plutonium-239. This process allows the breeder reactor to create more fissile material than it consumes, making it a sustainable source of nuclear fuel.
Yes, the nuclear reactor can be useful when it comes to making nuclear weapons. Uranium can be lowered into the operating reactor and can be bathed in the neutron flux to become (through nuclear transformation) plutonium. Plutonium is ready to be shaped into the subcritical masses used in nuclear weapons.
When uranium pellets in a nuclear reactor become overheated, the fuel rods can start to melt, leading to a loss of structural integrity. This can result in a partial or full meltdown of the reactor core, releasing radioactive materials into the environment and potentially causing a nuclear accident like the one that occurred in Chernobyl or Fukushima. Cooling systems must be maintained to prevent overheating.
Heavy water can be used in a nuclear reactor to moderate the speed of neutrons, making it easier for uranium-238 to absorb a neutron and become plutonium-239. This process is known as breeding plutonium in a reactor and is one method of producing plutonium for nuclear weapons or fuel.
Being radioactive, uranium is not a stable element.
Uranium does not naturally turn into krypton and barium. These elements are created through nuclear reactions, typically in a nuclear reactor or during nuclear fission processes. During these reactions, uranium atoms can split into smaller atoms like krypton and barium, releasing energy in the process.
In a properly operating nuclear reactor, water used to cool the reactor is not contaminated. This water, called primary coolant, is quite pure. And after shutdown and cooldown, the water has little radiation in it. But if the reactor has some malfunction that overheats the fuel, fuel elements can rupture or melt (a meltdown) and fission products, which are hightly radioactive, can be released into the coolant (the water). The water is then contaminated.
Yes, the nuclear fuel from a nuclear reactor must be replaced at some intervals, because the fuel can be poisoned with neutron absorbers and the clad can become fragile and unsure; the "burned" fuel is recycled.
Uranium minerals support a long way of transformations to become sintered pellets of uranium dioxide, the most common nuclear fuel.
Become radioactive and die..
my cousin became a nuclear reactor engineer and he said it was about 12 years
No. All elements with atomic number greater than 83 are radioactive, including some metals such as polonium, uranium, etc. But there are radioactive isotopes of most metals on the periodic table but are very rare and sometimes must be produced in reactor or particle accelerator.
Directly, no. Once fissioned the plutonium is gone (it has transformed to other lighter elements). However indirectly using a breeder reactor, yes. A plutonium fueled breeder reactor with a uranium breeding blanket will produce more plutonium (from uranium-238) than it consumes. This breeder reactor can at the same time be generating electricity like any other power reactor.