answersLogoWhite

0

In "Lamb to the Slaughter," Mary Maloney's actions can be seen as a crime of passion due to emotional distress rather than premeditated murder. Her sudden shock and impulse to protect her unborn child could be interpreted as a temporary loss of control rather than premeditated intent to kill her husband. The story leaves room for interpretation on whether her actions were driven by temporary insanity or not.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

What have been some successful criminal defenses?

Some successful criminal defenses are used by the defense attorney to the accused and some defenses include: insanity, temporary insanity, and the non-guilty plea.


Is Mary Maloney guilty in Lamb to the Slaughter?

Some people would argue that she planned out the entire killing and had full intentions on murdering her husband. They say that the way that she covered up the death and began to laugh at the end can only mean she did it on purpose. On the other hand, Mary Maloney may have been mentally insane. She was obviously obsessive over her husband and also had a child on the way and may have laughed at the end due to her insanity. It is solely up to the reader to decide if she is guilty or not which makes it such a great story. This is exactly why Dahl leaves out the conversation with her husband so that the reader will wonder what her and Patrick Maloney discussed and if his death was just or not.The answer to this question is that you can never know if Mary is guilty or not. It is up to the reader to decide.


If Mens Rea in Latin is Guilty Mind what is the opposite?

not guilty by reasons of insanity


Can insanity be used for a accepted guilt plea?

When someone successfully uses the insanity plea then they would plead not guilty by reason of insanity


Could insanity be a reason for pleading guilty?

You can try it.


A sentence for slaughter?

John led the pigs to the slaughter house. Hitler was guilty of slaughtering millions of innocents.


Can someone be found guilty of a crime if they are temporarily insane?

Most states allow a verdict of 'guilty but insane'. Temporary insanity is recognized in some states as a defense or as a mitigating factor in sentencing. A typical usage would be, for example, a woman opens her bedroom door to find her husband with a naked lady in bed with him. She shoots them dead. Temporary insanity might be attempted as a defense in California. The temporary insanity argument is not evenly applied; it is not for amateurs.Added; As a practical matter, the "insanity defense" is difficult and expensive in both time and money for the defendant to 'prove.' In this instance the burden falls on the defendant to convince the jury that they WERE temporarily insane at the time they committed the offense, NOT on the prosecution to prove that they weren't. The costs associated with medical and psychiatric examinations, diagnoses, and expert testimony, is a high barrier to its use as a successful defense, and juries are HIGHLY skeptical of such pleas.


Were the captain guilty of the Boston massacre?

Captain Preston was guilty charged with man-slaughter; meaning he acted in self defense.


Which defense contends that the defendant should be not guilty because his or her state of mind negates criminal responsibility?

The term is called 'mens rea' In order to be convicted of any crime, every 'element' of the crime must be proven by the government beyond a reasonable doubt. So, it depends on what the crime is, and what are the particular elements of the crime alleged. If the alleged crime includes a particular 'state of mind' or 'mens rea', the government would have to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant possessed the mens rea to commit the alleged offense. An example would be a defendant not being guilty by reason of a mental defect, sometimes called not guilty by reason of insanity. This explains why some defendants are not found guilty or not charged with some crime, and are instead committed to a government mental institution.


Can derealization stand as a criminal insanity plea?

The actual plea would have to be "Not Guilty by Reason of Insanity." The job for the defense attorney would have to be to prove the claim of "derealization" as sufficient enough to qualify under that plea.


What is a sentence for pleading?

The man was pleading insanity, but he was nevertheless convicted as "guilty."


Which Commandant of the Marine Corps was relieved of his duties?

Gale's short tenure as Lieutenant Colonel Commandant was punctuated with the dislike of the Secretary of the Navy who charged him in a court martial. The specifications included, "being intoxicated in common dram shops and other places of low repute." He pleaded not guilty by reason of temporary insanity but was found guilty and sentenced to dismissal from the service. SSgt Franklin II MEF