Shakespeare's work might not be considered to be classic because one has a peculiar definition of the word "classic". If your definition of "classic" is that it was produced by the ancient Romans and Greeks sometime before 400 AD., then Shakespeare does not fit.
They have been around for a long time and they are still amazingly popular. That's what classic means.
Definitely NOT.
in a chease factory
in 1623
no
he was a playwright poet and actor he was a dude
The famous book of white fang is considered a classic for many writters
Well, that really depends on your definition of classic. There were classics already when Shakespeare was writing, and he wasn't counted as part of them because his work was, then, contemporary and unproven. In the modern day, his work is certainly considered classic by many. Those who do not consider his work to be classic may be of the somewhat snobbish school of literature which considers only the incomprehensible, the multi-cultural, or the disenfranchised to be worthy. And certainly they may be worthy, but in that school neither Shakespeare nor Science Fiction will ever get a fair hearing.
Yes the 1959 Cadillac is considered to be a collectable car. Its unique shape and body work mean it is considered a classic design and highly sought after by collectors.
Because it is and has always been extremely entertaining.
Yes, "Dracula" by Bram Stoker is considered a classic novel of Gothic fiction and vampire literature. It has had a significant impact on popular culture and has remained a widely studied and adapted work since its publication in 1897.
Charlotte's Web is indeed considered a classic of children's literature, and by many adults as well.