0
it cost about US$1.8million
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
How big are wind turbine generators?
A 1.5 MW turbine is 80ms in height. A 3MW turbine is 90m in height. The world's largest-capacity turbine, the Enercon (7.58MW) is 198m in height.
How much does a 3MW wind turbine cost?
Refer to the "2008 Wind Technologies Market Report", issued by the Department of Energy in July 2009 (http://eetd.lbl.gov/EA/emp/reports/2008-wind-technologies.pdf). $1.3M per megawatt is right on (for 2008 data). Paul Hi: I asked the company Vestas this question. They are number two in the world in producing wind turbines. They told me the answer is based on a thousand factors but that the general rule of thumb is that wind turbines cost 1.3 to 1.5 million per megawatt. Cheers, Ben
Will 3mw ever return to WWE?
The 3MW is also known as the 3 Minute Warning in the WWE. The duo were cousins who wrestled for just a year before breaking up in 2003. There are no plans for the duo to ever return, since one has passed away.
How many turbines are there at the Thanet offshore wind farm?
Thanet Offshore Wind Farm has 100 x 3MW turbines.
Wave energy in the North Sea is strong to produce power for?
The Scottish executive approved funding for a 3MW wave farm in February, 2007 at a cost of over 4 million pounds. This is part of a £13 million funding package for marine power in Scotland.
How many wind turbines do you need to run a city?
A 1MW wind turbine will produce enough electricity to power 1,500 average sized homes. Because wind is not a constant, wind turbines are a secondary source of electricity and will never replace other sources. This being their big drawback. London by has 8,000,000 residents. If you were to assume 2 residents per household, that would be 4 million homes. Requiring 2,667 1MW turbines. 10,000 to run the city. 12-15,000, to run NYC. Vestas, the largest maufactures of wind turbines has capacities of 1-3MW. Which means 3,000 for London, and 5,000 for NYC, respectively.
How many windturbines would be needed to power the entire earths electricity needs?
well the total consumption of earths power on average sofar a year is 15TerraWatts of power, although this increases each year. the average output per year for 1 turbine is 0.35MegaWatts so that would mean, roughly 45000000 (fouty five million) wind turbines could more than power earths entirety (43Million is more than enough) even with 43 million there would be lots going to waist. Now the total cost of all this would be 460trillion dollars, which is not that much. it would be affordable if 10 or 20 of the worlds most wealthiest countries, gave a decent wack of money from their annual incomes (not that much tho) so like 25 of countries gave a 20 trillion dollar donation. (they make way more each year. its affordable, and will give too many benefits for it to be a rip off. -Ignore above. the 2000 gross world product was ~44 trillion. 460 trillion is more than all the world has. I've seen the 15 terawatt figure as well, so this may be a reasonable figure. A good sized land-based wind turbine today has a rating of 3MW, and a good power factor of 35% - so you can estimate an average turbine as being able to produce 3MW x .35 = 1.05MW constantly. Do the math and you end up with needing approximately 14.25 million good sized wind turbines. Actual cost cannot be calculated by this number. Significant upgrades to power infastructure is necessary to even begin to think about this sort of thing. Also, Virtually every power plant now in existence would need to be scrapped and replaced with large fast start type units. The amount of land needed and people to take care of such a system is staggering. Remember power production in and of itself does not provide any useful goods - this would simply increase the cost of power, which would decrease the amount of real goods produced from that power, and in the end bankrupt the world. just letting you know, America by itself spends atleast 20 trillion a year on war related stuff.14.35 million turbines might cost 120-171trillion(that's a retail price) you might be able to do it for 10-12trillion. and there is more than 460trillion on whole earth, Donald trump and bill gates and the late Micheal Jackson had atleast 15trillion (Micheal 5-10) each so that's, atleast 40trillion between 3 people, what about all the casinos. cocacola amitil make 500billion+ a yea. i think the total gross is not acurate to be honest, people are likely to hide money, and not many people are honest (especially rich people) on incomes there are parts of the earth that produce constant wind speeds of 150km/hour, putting a decent windfarm there would produce 75TerraWatts easily
What is maximum unit power input of chillers?
cincinnati ohio has a 3Mw (3,000,000W) at kings island park it runs a chilled water loop to air condition all the buildings when i worked for siemans we made 3 23,000Hp motors 23Mw that were shipped to japan for a steel mill im not really sure what they are used for bigger compressors for chillers are generally centrifugal smaller ones pistons or rotary
What movie and television projects has Kaye Quinley been in?
Kaye Quinley has: Played Football Wife in "Privacy" in 2006. Played Mother in "3MW: Subtitles Not Included" in 2009. Played Auntie Mildred in "A Wedding Most Strange" in 2011. Played Pam in "Love Nor Money" in 2011. Played Religious Woman in "The Watcher Self" in 2014. Played Mother in "The Day My Fish Died" in 2014.
How big are the blades of a windturbine?
There are wind turbine towers that are as tall as 262 feet, installed in Texas, according to a scientific paper titled, "LARGE SCALE DEPLOYMENT OF RENEWABLE ENERGY BY COMBINING WIND FARMS WITH SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANTS."
How much do nuclear power plants cost?
To give you an idea,Calvert Cliffs III (Maryland) is being built by UniStar, a joint venture of Constellation Energy Group and Électricité de France, which is 85 percent owned by the French government. Its current cost estimates approach $10 billion dollars.Different size plants cost different ammounts, so most published estimates are given in dollars per kW of production capacity. Even then, estimates for new construction vary widely. See related link ...
What will the preferable voltage level for the transmission of 3MW to 30Km.plz justify the answer.?
Preferrable depends on a lot of things. For someone looking at minimizing cost, a medium level voltage such as 34.5 or 69kV would probably be preferred due to the distance. This type of line is relatively cheap (when built overhead, not buried), but may still be beyond what its' worth for only 3 MW. The voltage level you'd choose would be the same as is available nearest you, in my opinion - so you can minimize how far you must build, which minimizes long term, land ownership costs. Since this is a fairly small load, the I^2*R losses would be fairly low through 34.5 or 69kV lines. Metering will most typically be done at the utility's end (if you own the line), so this may be important to maximize power that is being metered, resulting in a maximized payout to you. The basic balance is up front cost vs. long term cost vs. what other equipment must be upgraded to accommodate this addition. The higher the voltage, the higher the upfront cost will be; also the higher the fault currents can be, and the more complex relaying can be. Lower cost up front will result in more line loss, higher power transfer limitations, possibly extra equipment such as cap banks that you may be able to avoid at higher voltage (but not guarunteed). You may need to do your own research on this; the utility you are interfacing with should be very knowledgable about this sort of thing - discussion with protection and controls, system planning, and special study groups at the utility may be necessary to fully answer your question as each location in the power grid presents unique challenges to adding generation, and different codes apply to different voltage levels and areas (which they will know).
