No. Philip didn't conquer Persia. Alexander did.
In the sentence "Egypt was conquered by Persia, which was conquered by Alexander the Great," the adjective clause "which was conquered by Alexander the Great" is non-essential. It provides additional information about Persia but is not crucial to understanding the main point of the sentence, which is that Egypt was conquered by Persia. Removing the clause would still leave a complete and coherent sentence.
yes
Philip did not conquer Persia - he was assassinated on the eve of his departure for Persia and his son Alexander took over the project. The Hellenic League or League of Corinth was formed in 337 BCE was formed by him in an attempt to end inter-city fighting, give him dominance of the Greek world, of which he was named Hegemon (leader), and provide the basis for an invasion of Persia with the Greek base secure.
Back in 539BC, the Persians conquered Babylon.
Selim I conquered Persia in 1514 and he also conquered Egypt in 1517.
the largest kingdom conquered by alexander the great was Persia . your welcome :) ✔
Alexander the Great did...
yes yes he did
Alexander the Great.
Yes they did.
He conquered Persia
after persia was allied with sparta