It depends on what the error is, please post a new question with more details
A good 1995 error quarter can be woth up to $20 in good condition
its FIDOA coin containing a minting error. [ f(reaks), i(rregulars), d(efects), o(ddities)
It's very difficult to evaluate a suspected error coin based solely on a description. These coins should be examined in person by a dealer who's familiar with minting mistakes.
The value of a double struck quarter can vary significantly depending on its condition, rarity, and demand among collectors. Generally, a double struck quarter—where the coin has been struck twice during the minting process—can be worth anywhere from a few hundred to several thousand dollars. Key factors include the year of minting and whether it is a recognized error by coin grading services. It's advisable to have such coins appraised by a professional for an accurate valuation.
A 1983 quarter is worth $15,000 if it is a rare error coin, specifically the 1983 "No S" proof quarter, which was mistakenly struck without the mint mark. Authenticating its rarity requires verification from a reputable grading service, which will assess its condition and confirm its status as an error coin. Standard 1983 quarters without this error are only worth their face value. Collectors and dealers typically look for specific characteristics and minting details to determine the coin's value.
It's a novelty or magician's coin, NOT a Mint error, it may also be a home-made glued together coin, none have any numismatic collectible value.
There is no documentary evidence of this error. Any coin with a "genuine" minting flaw would have some value, above the usual, as a collectible coin. Genuinely flawed coins are not necessarily known about or documented until somebody turns up with one, since they are an "accident" of the minting process, and have escaped detection during quality control at the mint therefore, a valuation cannot be anticipated. A reputable coin dealer should be able to identify and confirm the coin as genuine and make a valuation.
Please take a closer look. The coin's minting date is 2005 and is at the bottom edge under the buffalo.You're almost certainly thinking of the 3-legged buffalo nickel error that occurred in 1937. Your quarter is a modern State Quarter commemorating the year Kansas became a state. Unlike the nickel, the image of the buffalo intentionally shows only three legs; it's not an error.
Unless the coin has a minting error, it's just face value--one dollar. The most common minting error is missing edge inscriptions on the George Washington dollar.
If the nickel is new but missing its date it could be a minting error or an altered coin. As with most suspected error coins it would have to be inspected in person to be sure.
State quarter errors refer to the mistakes or variations that occurred during the minting of the U.S. state quarters, which were released from 1999 to 2008. These errors can include misprints, such as incorrect designs, missing elements, or unusual mint marks. Some notable examples include the 2004 Wisconsin quarter with a "high leaf" and "low leaf" error and the 2005 Minnesota quarter with an extra tree. Collectors often seek these error coins due to their rarity and potential value.
A penny that did not get printed on the back, also known as a "mule" or an error coin, can be worth significantly more than its face value to collectors, depending on its rarity and condition. Such coins are considered collectible errors and can fetch prices ranging from a few dollars to hundreds or even thousands, depending on demand. The specific value would be determined by factors such as the year of minting and the marketplace for error coins.