0
What else can I help you with?
What was the role of the ilustrados in the development of nationalism in the Philippines?
the role of illustrados are to easing the sufferings of the filipino; and also wanted to have reforms
Why did the illustrados in Europe undertake propaganda movement?
The illustrados in Europe undertook the propaganda movement to advocate for political reforms in the Philippines, such as representation in the Spanish Cortes and equal rights for Filipinos. They also aimed to raise awareness about the social injustices and lack of opportunities facing Filipinos under Spanish colonial rule.
Who were the Filipinos who gained wealth from renting huge lands owned by the friars like the Rizal family?
The illustrados, a class of educated Filipinos, gained wealth by renting vast lands owned by the friars, such as the Rizal family. They leveraged their connections with the Spanish colonial powers to secure land grants, enabling them to amass wealth and influence in society. This system perpetuated social inequality in the Philippines.
What is the Philippines during rizal's time?
Jose Rizal is the Philippine national hero. He was able to witness the brutality and unjust act of the Spaniards. He became a member of Illustrados that started the revolution by opposing the Spanish governance.
Discrimination found in noli me tangere?
"Noli Me Tangere" by Jose Rizal portrays various forms of discrimination prevalent in Filipino society during the Spanish colonial period. It depicts discrimination based on social class, with the Spanish friars and wealthy illustrados oppressing and exploiting the indios and mestizos. The novel also explores discrimination based on race and ethnicity, as seen in the mistreatment of Filipinos by the colonizers. Additionally, the book highlights discrimination against women, as demonstrated by the limited rights and opportunities available to female characters like Maria Clara.
Why did the Spaniards did not teach spanish language to the Filipinos?
This is very misleading one that was probably taught by the Americans to brainwash those Filipinos. Queen Isabella II of Spain issued a decree in 1863 requiring education be made available to the indigenous locals. Also misleading is the thought that the Americans replaced Spanish with English making Filipinos "forget" the Spanish language. The main reasons why Filipinos don't speak Spanish is due to some factors: 1. Spanish was never spoken at home by the majority of population. It was only the Mestizos, Filipinos (a term then exclusive only for Philippine born Spaniards) & Peninsulares (Spaniards from Spain) who could able to speak it. 2. The 1863 decree made education readily available for the natives. However unlike the US, Spain didn't imposed free public education system & so it was only the Illustrados (wealthy natives) such as Dr. Jose Rizal who could afford to send their children to school. The majority of the locals were poor & couldn't afford to study. 3. Philippines was the least hispanized nation among all the countries that Spain invaded. Equatorial Guinea is even more hispanized than the Philippines. The reason is that there were only very few Spaniards who stayed in the Philippines & so there were not much racial intermixing unlike in Latin America. Therefore there wasn't a necessity for the majority of the people to learn Spanish unless they have a Spaniard father.
Factors of the rise of Filipino nationalism?
* The rising of illustrados (people with bright mind) - They are rised due to some Filipinos are going to the Western countries and study there. * Issue of secularization and the death of GOMBURZA (Padre Mariano Gomez, Padre Jose Burgos and Padre Jacinto Zamora) - February 17, 1872 when the 3 priests were sentenced to die because they impute that they are the leaders of 1872 Cavite mutiny. The paid witness is Francisco Zaldua. One of the witnesses of the death sentence is Dr. Jose Rizal and his brother Paciano.
What factors influence the spread of nationalism?
THe factors that give birth to nationalism in the philippines is that the time when many foreigners invaded the country specially during the spanish period who enslaved the filipino people who supposively the ones who owned the land who worked for the ivaders thats why they exact revenge... another is Dr. Jose Rizal who wrote 2 novels Noli me tangere and El filibustirismu that woke up the hearts of Filipino to fight for their mother land...
Why some critics don't like Rizal as your hero?
Ah, where to begin? One must first ask, why are there no answers to this question? And then you begin to speculate, and the first thought that comes to mind is, it"s silly!!! Everyone likes Rizal as the hero, right? Wrong! The ones who would ask or answer the question are either too intimidated to do so or have no knowledge about Rizal's detractors. Many know Rizal only from the "brainwashing" they received all their life regarding this hero of hero's. For those of you who would want to immediately put me in the category of a "Rizal detractor" I would want you to know that I am not. I do have a minimal knowledge of this extraordinary man. Getting back to the question. There are so many reasons why Rizal should and shouldn't be a national hero. I will extend to you the reader, only a few. Most of you have already made up your mind or had your mind made up for you. Why do I say that? Primarily because we have here in the Philippines, The Rizal Law. By law Rizal is taught in all of the schools. It is taught that he is a national hero. There is no room in this law for dissent. If you question, you are considered unpatriotic. That is what I meant by being intimidated. No country on God's green earth should have to mandate its heroes, don't you think? Sorry, back to the point. Rizal was a very highly educated and complex person. He was not the one you read about in the comic books of your youth. He lived out of the country most of his life. He lived in Europe a good deal of the time. He did not come from the working class of people in the Philippines. He came from a privileged class called the "illustrados". During his entire life, Rizal was faithful to the Crown of Spain. He was opposed to the armed revolution and volunteered his services to Spain to do whatever he could to stop it. He volunteered to go to Cuba in the service of Spain to help serve Spain against the forces of the revolutionaries in Cuba who were suffering the same repression that Filipinos were. Even though Rizal wrote of the terrible injustices inflicted by the cruel Church and Spain, he refused to fight and thought it better to ask for concessions. Was Rizal a revolutionary or what is referred to as a "hopeless romantic? For sure he loved his country and it's people. In his time he was perhaps the most highly educated Filipino. Was he a leader? No! He knew nothing of organizing the Filipinos into a nationalistic movement. He was a great writer but did not write in the language of the people of his country. And not once has he or any other Filipino patriot ever suggested changing the name of the country. The beautiful people of this archipelago are still clinging to that odious name given to them by the invaders who have raped, killed, and enslaved tens of thousands of a peace loving people the likes of which this world has never seen. ANOTHER THING, Rizal did little to other parts of our country who fiercely drove the Spaniards in their territory(THE MUSLIMS of Mindanao) and the inhabitants of Mountain Province because the Spaniards are lazy to climb mountains.
Analysis of rizal's life?
Ilang daang taon na ang lumipas nang mabuhay si Rizal sa daigdig na ito, subalit hanggang ngayon wala pa ring kasiguraduhan ang lahat ng Pilipino sa kanyang pagkatao. Marami pa rin ang nagtatanong, kung ano nga ba ang ating pambansang bayani? Ayaw niya nga ba ng rebolusyon at nanatili siyang naniwalang "the pen is mightier than the sword"?Mahirap ikulong ang isang tulad ni Rizal sa iisang kategorya lamang. Depende sa bumabasa sa kanyang pagkatao, marami ang punto de vistang lalabas, marami ang maggigiit, at mas marami din naman ang magbibigay sintensya sa kani-kanilang haka-haka. Tulad na lamang ni Agoncillo, aniya, ang gaya daw ni Rizal ay "Reformist middle class intellectuals called ilustrados & the true revolutionaries were the masses"; at ayon naman kay Renato Constantino, "the illustrados provide the masses the ideology of European liberalism".Ang papel na ito ay susubukang basahin si Rizal sa pamamagitan ng dalawang libro: ang "A Nation Aborted" ni Floro Quibuyen at ang "Rules for Radical" ni Saul Alinsky. Sa unang libro, ipapakita ang tantiya ni Quibuyen kay Rizal, na ayon sa kanya, si Rizal ay isang radikal, anti-statist, at hindi basta repormista lamang. Susubukan naman naming sukatin ang mga pahayag na ito gamit ang 'rules for radical' ni Alinsky.Quibuyen: Radikal si RizalPaano nasabi ni Quibuyen na radikal nga si Rizal? Una, tignan muna natin kung ano ang mithiin ni Rizal: isang bayan na buo, ethical community, a nation without borders. Pero upang makamit ito, hindi kinakailangan ng dahasna kung saan ang mga alipin ng kasalukuyan ay magiging tirano ng kinabukasan. Matatandaan na sinabi ito ni Jose Rizal kay Dr. Pio Valenzuela nang dalawin siya nito noong siyang nasa Dapitan. Aniya, hindi pa iyan ang sagot sa ating problema, dahil hindi pa kayo handa - kailangan ninyo ng armas upang lumaban at kailangan ng kahandaan sa anumang pakikipaglaban. Mula rito, mahihinuha natin na hindi sa ayaw ni Rizal sa rebolusyon, hindi dahil sa sinabi niya na ayaw niya ng dahas ay ayaw na niya sa rebolusyon. Ayaw niya na maglunsad sa rebolusyon nang hindi pa handa. Malaki ang pagkakaiba ng dalawang bagay na ito, at kung ating iisipin, kung talagang ayaw ni Rizal sa rebolusyon, bakit niya papayuhan si Valenzuela tungkol sa magagawa nila upang paunlarin ang binabalak nilang rebolusyon? At kung ating papansinin, ang tema na pumapaimbulog sa kabuuan ng Noli at El Fili ay ang kaisipan na ang mga taong pinagkaitan ng lahat at pinagmamalupitan pa ng labis ay maaaring magkawatak-watak at tuluyang mapipi ng lipunan, subalit kung nanaisin maaari silang magsama-sama sa pakikibaka nang sa ganoon ay mabuo ang isang nasyon na kikilalanin nating sariling atin.Sa buhay naman ni Rizal makikita natin ang kanyang panindigan tungkol sa rebolusyon noong 1887 hanggang 1888, nang umusad na ang kaso sa Hacienda ng mga Mercado (Rizal) sa Calamba. Sa kanilang alitan ni del Pilar, lumilitaw na nanalig si Rizal na makakapit ng Pilipinas ang independiyensiya sa pamamagitan ng mapayapang pakikibaka, ngunit isang malaking pagkakamali pa rin ang pangongolonya ng Espanya sa Pilipinas. At matapos nga ng insidenteng iyon, nagtayo si Rizal ng La Liga Filipina kasama si Andres Bonifacio - isang hayag na rebolusyonaryo (batay sa kung ano ang pagpapakahulugan ng nakararami sa kung ano ang isang rebolusyonaryo). At dahil nga sa Calamba Hacienda Case, pinatunayan ni Buencamino (dating legal counsel nila Rizal) na tinutulak daw ni Jose Rizal ang mga tao sa rebolusyon nang himukin ni Rizal ang mga kasama na huwag magbayad ng renta sa lupa sa mga kinauukulan. At ayon kay Quibuyen, sa pagkakataong ito umiigting ang pagiging radical-separatist ni Rizal.Sa sulat naman ni Rizal kay Blumentritt, malinaw niyang ipinahayag dito na ang pagiging kolonya ng Pilipinas (at pananatili nito sa ganitong kalagayan) ay nakasasama sa Bayan. At kung matatandaan rin, sa kanyang sulatin na The Indolence of the Filipino People, sinabi niyang ang katamaran at kabobohan na ibinibintang sa mga Pilipino ay mauugat sa maling pamamalakad sa bansa ng mga kolonyalista.
