Before we jump to conclusions here we have to analyze the situations that made hitting a cow on the road before we start pointing fingers at each other and start playing the blame-game here. Because there is not enough information to be attained to answer this question fully and to really see who's fault it really was, a number of questions have to be answered before any law suits or claims can be filed in accordance to this accident.
For the cattle producer:
For the driver:
Typically it really depends on a lot of variables to really say who's fault it was for hitting that bovine on the road. It could range from nobody's fault to both the driver and the producer's fault to the producer's fault to the driver's fault. It could even be the cow's fault. Only until we know the exact circumstances of this accident we will not be able to lay the finger of blame on anybody.
However, if the driver is found to be not At Fault and hit the animal by accident (likely because the cow got scared that it, in a panicked state, ran in front of the vehicle than away from it), then it would most likely be the producer's fault because [s]he has the responsibility of keeping fences in good shape enough to keep his/her animals in and not out. It would also be the producer's fault, if his fences are in good shape, to cull or confine those animals that are most likely to or have the history of jumping or breaking fences to get out to an area where this will not happen. If the producer fails to both maintain his/her fences and know which animals are likely to test the fence than others, then it would be that producer's fault.
But then another question emerges: What if it was a third party or "Acts of God" that is to blame for the cow escaping? What if it wasn't just that cow that escaped but a number of other cattle that did? The one likely reason for a large number of animals escaping is up to two possible causes: a severe thunderstorm that caused the animals to panic and escape from their holdings, or a pack of dogs from various neighbors harassed a herd of cattle so much that those animals had broken through the fence and escaped.
Thus, as mentioned above, we need WAY more information in order to come to a full conclusion about this incident.
The driver is responsible for hitting the cow. The sign is there to warn drivers to take care in case cows are crossing the road.
If you jaywalk and get hit badly, you will be considered at fault. This is because you were breaking the law and acting in an unsafe manner.
The driver that hit you. Not knowing all the circumstances, the unlicensed driver would be at fault in the driving aspect, and in the fact that he/she should not have been on the road at all. Just a personal opinion
There are far too many unknowns to this question to be able to answer it properly. However, you can take a look at the related question below for inspiration in your decision as to who deserves the blame and who doesn't.
You. The person pulling into traffic.
the deer
their fault because they werent in the cross walk
If the dog is on the road when you hit it, it's the dogs owner fault (the dog should bave been restrained).
It is your fault for hitting an object that does not move. The owner of the road can not be held at fault unless he or she created it for the purpose of damaging a car.
You are! For not being cautious when reversing on to a road. You should make sure that it is safe and clear when reversing, if you hit another car it is your fault and not the person that is driving on the roads fault.
you were the at fault driver for the simple fact that you did not have insurance. Which means you should not have been on the road in the first place. If you had'nt been on the road the accident would'nt have happened.
Both parties are at fault for not being insured - in most countries this is a criminal offense, the law requires that drivers are covered by third party insurance.Usually a car pulling out of a side road should normally give way to on coming traffic which has the right of way - thus car A is at fault.