NO. THE UNIVERSAL LAW STILL APPLIES -- ENERGY CANNOT BE CREATED NOR DESTROYED -- ONLY TRANSFORMED.
Actually in amplifier we give it the Vcc,Vee,Vbb which is such value from which the gain of an amplifier cannot increase till the point of Vcc,it holds the law of conservation of energy but if gain reaches to Vcc then it is in cutoff region so,never the amplification process violate the law of conservation of energy
Actually in amplifer we want the required phase shift+amount of required voltage from sources present so this is actually the use of amplifier that it enhances our strength over particular shape waveform and magnitude at required point
First law of thermodynamics: energy cannot be created nor destroyed.
Energy can not be created or destroyed, it only changes form.
camputer virus law
The term used to indicate that those in power are not above the law is rule of the law. This is considered to nomocracy where the law is the superior governing authority in a nation.
Moore's Law is the law that describes that on average, computers double their capacity every 18 to 24 months.
No, nothing can violate the law of conservation of energy, it's a law! Energy can convert to mass, and mass can convert to energy, but the overall total of mass and energy in the universe is constant.
yes
no it does not violate the law of conservation of energy as energy is not lost/destroyed but transferred to the brakes of the truck.
I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.I believe you want to get energy from the magnet without any energy input? No, that is not possible, because that would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.
No. So far this has not been possible. Since a "gravity shield" would make it possible to violate the law of conservation of energy, it is probably not possible, either.No. So far this has not been possible. Since a "gravity shield" would make it possible to violate the law of conservation of energy, it is probably not possible, either.No. So far this has not been possible. Since a "gravity shield" would make it possible to violate the law of conservation of energy, it is probably not possible, either.No. So far this has not been possible. Since a "gravity shield" would make it possible to violate the law of conservation of energy, it is probably not possible, either.
No; that doesn't make much sense since it would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy.
No. Its the LAW! Not a suggestion! The waste energy just goes somewhere else, like heat radiation of thermal conduction.
no Nothing violates that law.
It is the idea of a machine continuously producing energy, without energy input - or producing more energy than what is put into the machine. This would violate the First Law of Thermodynamics (conservation of energy), and in general, it is not believed to be possible. No process is known which violates the conservation of energy. (A "perpetual motion machine of the second kind" would violate the Second Law of Thermodynamics; this is generally believed to be impossible, too.)
no Nothing violates that law.
Quite simply, that would violate the law of conservation of energy - a.k.a. the First Law of Thermodynamics. No exception has been found so far for this law. This would be like trying to get something out of nothing; the total amount of energy has been found to be constant - no exceptions.Quite simply, that would violate the law of conservation of energy - a.k.a. the First Law of Thermodynamics. No exception has been found so far for this law. This would be like trying to get something out of nothing; the total amount of energy has been found to be constant - no exceptions.Quite simply, that would violate the law of conservation of energy - a.k.a. the First Law of Thermodynamics. No exception has been found so far for this law. This would be like trying to get something out of nothing; the total amount of energy has been found to be constant - no exceptions.Quite simply, that would violate the law of conservation of energy - a.k.a. the First Law of Thermodynamics. No exception has been found so far for this law. This would be like trying to get something out of nothing; the total amount of energy has been found to be constant - no exceptions.
It isn't entirely clear what you mean with "perpetual machine". If you mean the old dream of the "perpetuum mobile", such a machine would violate the Law of Conservation of Energy; there are various reasons to assume that this law can't be violated:* Despite lots of attempts, by thousands of ingenious inventors, and over centuries, nobody has managed to violate Conservation of Energy so far. * Violating Conservation of Energy would also violate lots of other laws of physics, which are generally considered to be true. For example, Conservation of Mass, and Conservation of Momentum. * By Nöther's Theorem, the possibility that the amount of energy changes over time would be equivalent to the laws of physics changing over time! - Nowadays, the Law of Conservation of Energy is normally derived from Nöther's Theorem.