Yes, it is possible to prove that the clique problem is NP-complete.
Proving that a problem is NP-complete involves demonstrating that it is both in the NP complexity class and that it is at least as hard as any other problem in NP. This typically involves reducing a known NP-complete problem to the problem in question, showing that a solution to the problem in question can be used to solve the known NP-complete problem efficiently.
No. You can only state correctness to a degree of certainty. That degree might be very high, particularly for a very short routine, but no one can prove correctness to 100%.
Use your credit card to prove your identity.
To use the pumping lemma to prove that a language is not regular, you would assume the language is regular and then show that there is a string in the language that cannot be "pumped" according to the lemma's conditions. This contradiction would indicate that the language is not regular.
Yes, the pumping lemma is a tool used in formal language theory to prove that a language is not regular. It involves showing that for any regular language, there exists a string that can be "pumped" to generate additional strings that are not in the language, thus demonstrating that the language is not regular.
Sounds like gang talk or clique's. Until you prove worthy to be a insider you are an outsider. There are steps you have to do to become a insider.
A statement that presents a possible solution to a problem is the hypothesis. You construct a hypothesis, then work to prove it. Basic geometry concentrates on proving various nypotheses.
To prove the hypothesis. To disprove the hypothesis.
It is not possible to prove something that is not true. The square of 2 is rational, not irrational.
Yes. No problem.
No you would have to prove the lineage to prove he is a purebreed.
The worst possible. Statistics prove it.
It is certainly possible that they did, but there is currently no evidence to prove it.
What have we got to prove? Whether we have to prove a triangle as an Isoseles triangle or prove a property of an isoseles triangle. Hey, do u go to ALHS, i had that same problem on my test today. Greenehornet15@yahoo.com
The presence of an uncontrolled variable might be revealed.a failed simulation does prove something but its limited on what you can prove
to prove to others that everything is possible
DNA test. Period.