a model that goes back to an earlier step in the process
Iterative
Water fall modelwaterfall model always attempt to start with full requirementsWaterfall model is linear process flow execution.Each five framework activities in sequentially flow beginning with communication and culminating with deployment.In this linear process you can't go back.Doesn't response to resources.Inefficient used of resources.The waterfall model some time called the classic life cycle as well as linear process model/sequential model.In waterfall model more time spend in documentingIncremental modelIncremental model is process of repetitions developed in smaller chunks.An iterative life cycle model doesn't attempt to start with full requirements.This process is repeated producing a new version of software for each cycle of the model.In this incremental process you can go back.we are build the product step by step. W e can track the defects at early stages.This avoid the down word flow of the defects.In iterative model less time spend on documenting.example: Agile,XP (Extreme programming),scrum.
I will try to answer this quickly as I don't have much time. As the name suggests, the waterfall model follows the path of an waterfall. It starts in the first stage of orientation, and ends at the release. It can only go one way (to the end goal) and the stages are very strict (you cant go back to a earlier stage). The Spiral model understands that reality doesn't always follow theory, and that an project should be designed to follow that reality. There are multiple prototypes released, and phases can be repeated until the desired result is reached (hence the spiral). The iterative model combines those two, making (IMHO) the waterfall model more ready for the real world. You should try googling yourself, I found lots of info about the differences in this article about the advantages of the waterfall model: http://www.waterfall-model.com/the-waterfall-model-avantages-and-disadvantages
Early/single
There is nothing like a "best" software development model. However, let us how it has evolved. Conventionally, everybody was using the waterfall model, where you start with requirements gathering, then analysis and design, architecture, coding, testing and maintenance. All these were done sequentially. But then, the characteristics of software is different from something like a "building construction". There are different set of problems: 1. Requirements may not be clear. 2. Users may not be able to tell or the developers may not be able to understand, the "real requirements" 3. A particular design may not suite the chosen architecture 4. Users will "ask for more" when they see the software. 5. It is important we "attack" the most risky items first. 6. Testing cannot be an activity at the end. All these prompted a spiral model, or what is referred to as "iterative" and "incremental". In fact Unified Modeling Language (UML) which is being commonly used now is closely related to iterative and incremental process. For most of the modern software development efforts iterative and incremental process suits well.
Iterative waterfall model is a software process model also called the incremental process model. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iterative_and_incremental_development
Iterative
You can use Iterative model.
In iterative model we get an end product at the end of each iteration. Iterative model is not so efficient and time consuming.
nothing
yes
Major difference between waterfall and iterative model is that waterfall model has a linear process in which full product is available after the last phase, while incremental model full product is available after several such phases.
Iterative model is used when tight market deadlines make completion of a comprehensive software product impossible, but a limited version must be introduced in order to meet competitive or business pressure; a set of core product or system requirements are well understood, but the details of product or system extensions have yet to be defined. In these and above situations, a process model is required that has been explicitly designed to accommodate a product that evolves over time. Iterative model provides the best help in such situation.
The Rational Unified Process (RUP) is an iterative software development framework that incorporates elements of the Spiral Model, such as risk management and incremental development. Both approaches emphasize iterative cycles and refining the product through continuous feedback and assessment. RUP breaks the development process into phases and iterations, similar to the Spiral Model's focus on repeated cycles of planning, risk analysis, engineering, and evaluation. Ultimately, RUP can be seen as a structured implementation of the principles found in the Spiral Model, providing a more defined process with specific roles and artifacts.
spiral model is iterative model hence its easy to implement it .
The process of backing up, re-thinking, and gathering information makes the scientific method an iterative process.
The Iterative Enhancement Model is an approach to building software in which the overall lifecycle is compose of several iterations in sequence. The Evolutionary Enhancement Model is designed to be allowed to evolve in response to the customers' feedback.