Computers are better than humans in some aspects. They are never incorrect. They behave like a machine, so they don't have emotions to affect the output and they always follow the same path unless they are directed not to.
On the other hand, a computer needs to be told how to interpret something. They require detailed structured information to gives us the results we want, and it can't make decisions like humans can to correct as they go along. Ex. when we are told to go to a door and open the handle, we can judge how far we need to walk, we judge which way to turn the handle, we judge what to do if there are obstacles or the door is locked. A robot cannot make these corrections and needs to be programmed step by step to open a handle. It also can't interpret information that is outside of their programming (ex. you could read the follow 'A' and you would know its a letter A. You could also read 'a' and know its a letter A. You could read it written in cursive, or by a child, or by your own hand, or see the letter A in a cloud, or in a tree, or in a reflection.) Furthermore, as computers are made by humans, they contain humans' mistakes.
The smartest computer on the planet is as smart as a five year old human. Humans can be as smart as they want to be.
well, who do you think invented computers?
The human brain is still more complex than the most extreme machines. We have much more neurons than the number of processors any machine could have.
of course they will, how do you think society and humans can survive without computers? they will be a lot different than today, that's for sure. like quantum computers or bio computers.
Humans can evolve - Computers cannot Humans can disobey instructions - Computers cannot Humans are organic - Computers aren't There are more, but I won't go on
They are not necessarily better. They are large computers, capable of storing a lot more information that other computers and they can be used by more than one person at a time. They would be used in large companies and organisations, that require a lot of power and memory to deal with their work. So they are designed for different kinds of work than other smaller computers, but that doesn't mean they are better. Each type of computer has its own importance and uses.
Are computers better data processors than humans
Anytime..anyday humans are better than computers because its human who made computers and not vice-versa. so result is clear humans are better
No, because humans invented computers so computers cannot be smarter than humans.
yes dell computers are better than phillip computers!
well, who do you think invented computers?
no
It depends on the task you are trying to accomplish. For easy tasks, such as adding 2 and 2, humans far out-succeed computers. But when it comes to larger, more complicated computations, computers excel and are able to perform the computation much faster than humans.
No, computers are not smarter than humans, because humans made the technology, so they obviously have the knowledge greater than a device made for knowledge, like a nook, which only helps you learn, not that we are actually a being teaching another. They are programmed to do so.
way way way better dude
It depends entirely on the computer. No brand is inherently better than another. Computers are the sum of their parts.
A human made the computer, so it's physically impossible. It may be better at stuff than humans, but you can't say it's smarter.
computers are made by humans for humans