By stabing it in the face
LCDs require less power than CRTs, they also do not flicker.
graphics artists.. the color reproduction is better on a crt then on most low grade lcds... and they are cheaper then the expensive lcds wow the first decent question today.. congrats, everyone else in an idiot
An "LCD" is a Liquid Crystal Display. LCDs are used as parts of computer monitors and as displays in calculators, watches etc.
They are extremely large in comparison to LCD monitors, and they require far more power. So yes, CRTs are typically considered obsolete by today's standards, especially with the introduction of LED LCDs, which have a far better black level and color contrast. LED/LCD monitors also have far greater resolution, since a typical CRT resolution is about 480i, while LED/LCDs can handle resolutions up to 4K. LED/LCDs have much sharper picture, due to higher resolution, and modern LED/LCDs don't have the motion blur problems that earlier LCDs had. These factors make modern LED/LCDs better than CRTs in almost every aspect, and are the cause of CRTs becoming obsolete.
It doesnt produce its own color it uses a cartridge that has color ink.
LCDs are much higher resolution.
The colors on the color spectrum combined to produce gray are black and white.
The color is brick red.
Don't be too quick to write off plasma TVs. Even with all the advances in LCD technology, plasma displays still produce the darker blacks that account for the sharpness of their pictures. Plasma TVs also have a slight advantage over LCDs when they are located in a bright environment. Highly lit rooms may cause LCDs to have a washed out appearance, but plasma TVs will not experience this issue. Also worth mentioning is that as LCDs ascend to domination, plasmas will continue to offer exceptional pictures at ever declining prices.
With black
Not noticeably. LCDs are very low-power.
When iodine solution is mixed with starch solution they produce blue-black color.