No.
JPEG uses a compression algorithm with Loss (it means that the new picture's quality is worse than the original's)
The picture in JPEG takes less place on the storage device, but it has some artifacts because of the compression.
Nowadays a good JPEG compression is invisible to the eye, but you can't have a better quality for printing.
Jpeg files are smaller than bitmap files, though bitmap files are much better quality.
Yes, the component input will yield a better picture than the s-video input.
Absolutely, high definition camera are better than their quaint ancestors. High definition allows clearer picture, more pixels for more detail in photo or printing and a sharper focus.
Johannesburg Gutenberg was famous for developing a better printing press.
An inkjet printer wil be better for printing photographs.
Check Maxwell Dickson in LA. They do picture to canvas printing so they may be able to fill your needs or at least point you in the direction of a business better suited.
yes, it is best to let photoshop do it.why? well, converting your photos are done by compressing them there for it is better to compress them via software than firmware or use a more powerful computer to get accurate compression.
According to PC World, if your mostly printing black and white a laser printer is the way to go. They are faster and the quality is better. Inkjets are superior for color printing.
For printing purposes, PNG is generally better than JPEG because it is a lossless format that preserves image quality without compression artifacts.
The Printing company in your area that offer bulk pricing is Branson screen printing. You would have a better selection is you were willing to get the prints made online.
Enter a picture that is better than the competition's.
In any international airport money changers would be there. For better conversion rates it's better to convert outside the airport. If you are in transit it's better to convert in Singapore rather in India.