Yes, it is possible to support time-sharing without multiprogramming, though it would be highly inefficient. Time-sharing systems can allocate CPU time to a single process in a way that allows multiple users to interact with the system simultaneously, but without multiprogramming, only one user process would execute at a time. This approach would lead to significant idle time and poor resource utilization, undermining the benefits of a time-sharing system. Ultimately, multiprogramming enhances the efficiency and responsiveness of time-sharing by allowing multiple processes to coexist and utilize CPU time effectively.
Yes, multi-programming is possible without any interrupts. Provided that a given type of code is properly written then multi-programming is possible without any interrupts.
Two possible security problems could be: copying another user's data; using system resources (CPU, memory, disk space) without proper accounting.
Yes, UNIX supports multiprogramming, allowing multiple processes to run concurrently. This capability enables efficient resource utilization by sharing the CPU among various tasks, improving system performance and responsiveness. UNIX achieves this through process scheduling and management, ensuring that processes can execute simultaneously without interference.
To upload a picture onto facebook without sharing it is not possible im verry sorry. You could upload it and then delete the "share"
When a program that is being processed by the CPU issues an I/O command, control is passed to the I/O processor and the CPU is freed to process other programs. This is known as passive multiprogramming. The problem with this, is that the interruptions are primarily controlled by the programs and not the CPU. As an answer to this problem, the CPU was given the control with the advent of active multiprogramming. Active multiprogramming enabled a program to use a preset slice of CPU time before putting the program on hold to process another program. This became the advent of CPU time slicing and became the foundation for time-sharing systems in the 1960's and forward.Active is to do something with energy, while passive is to accept what comes without putting much effort forth.
Time-sharing is sharing a computing resource among many users by means of multiprogramming and multi-tasking. Its introduction in the 1960s, and emergence as the prominent model of computing in the 1970s, represents a major technological shift in the history of computing. By allowing a large number of users to interact concurrently with a single computer, time-sharing dramatically lowered the cost of providing computing capability, made it possible for individuals and organizations to use a computer without owning one, and promoted the interactive use of computers and the development of new interactive applications.
When a program that is being processed by the CPU issues an I/O command, control is passed to the I/O processor and the CPU is freed to process other programs. This is known as passive multiprogramming. The problem with this, is that the interruptions are primarily controlled by the programs and not the CPU. As an answer to this problem, the CPU was given the control with the advent of active multiprogramming. Active multiprogramming enabled a program to use a preset slice of CPU time before putting the program on hold to process another program. This became the advent of CPU time slicing and became the foundation for time-sharing systems in the 1960's and forward.Active is to do something with energy, while passive is to accept what comes without putting much effort forth.
When a program that is being processed by the CPU issues an I/O command, control is passed to the I/O processor and the CPU is freed to process other programs. This is known as passive multiprogramming. The problem with this, is that the interruptions are primarily controlled by the programs and not the CPU. As an answer to this problem, the CPU was given the control with the advent of active multiprogramming. Active multiprogramming enabled a program to use a preset slice of CPU time before putting the program on hold to process another program. This became the advent of CPU time slicing and became the foundation for time-sharing systems in the 1960's and forward.Active is to do something with energy, while passive is to accept what comes without putting much effort forth.
No. You can't get it back without paying the full amount back first.
While language plays a significant role in expressing culture, it is still possible to share aspects of a culture without sharing the same language. Cultural exchange can occur through food, art, music, and traditions that transcend language barriers and enable people to connect and understand each other's cultures.
No. Supporting same-sex marriage is a political decision unrelated to one's sexual orientation. It is possible to support women's rights without being a woman. It is possible to support immigrant rights without being an immigrant. Likewise, supporting same-sex marriage does not mean you yourself are gay.
A multiprogramming system is considered an online system when it can process multiple jobs simultaneously while maintaining interaction with users. This means that the system is always available and can handle user requests in real-time, allowing for immediate responses. In contrast, offline systems process jobs in batches without direct user interaction. Thus, an online multiprogramming system enhances user experience by providing timely access to resources and services.