Both forms are right. "he's" is the contracted form of "he is". Contractions are usually used in speech and full forms are usually used formal writing. It's acceptable to use either of them most of the time. However, when the verb "be" is stressed (as after "Yes" in short answers), you have to use the full form.
Is Tom a doctor?
Yes, he is. ( not he's)
,but
Is Tom at the beach?
No, he's not.
he is = he's
she is = she's
it is = it's
I am = I'm
We are = we're
they are = they're
you are = you're
Yes, that is correct grammar.
I have to HAVE it cleaned.I had to HAVE it cleaned.
This should say, The next stop will be somewhere in Vasayas, then it will be correct grammar. Written as it is it is not on correct grammar.
No, it is not correct
No, it's not correct grammar. The correct way to say it is: "was able to confirm"
No, it is not proper grammar. The correct phrasing is "you and I."
No, the correct grammar would be "Look at what you got."
Yes, 'you were correct' is perfect grammar. An example sentence: You were correct when you said that a tomato is a fruit.
Yes
Absolutely.
No, The correct grammar for this sentence would be, "He finished doing his homework."
Yes, it is correct to say out of compliance with. It means out of help with in English grammar.