In most cases, yes. When using a computer, you eliminate the fact that we as humans can forget, make mistakes, and use information incorrectly. Because of that, we have to double check on our answers and it is time consuming. Computers are a little more hard-coded so they don't use the wrong information.
On the other-hand, it depends on what kind of problem you are trying to solve (such as non-math problems). It all depends on how good the program is and how perfect the code is made by the programmer. Also, the user of the program can make a mistake putting in information onto the computer.
An "algorithm" is a method to solve a problem. These methods are more or less independent of the language. First you think about how you will solve a certain problem, step by step. Then you translate this into a computer program.
It can help you solve the problem more easily to get the exact answer.
It can help you solve the problem more easily to get the exact answer.
for more information to guide you
You do not have enough information to solve this problem. More accurately, you do not have enough information to assign a numeric value to z. However, abstractly, you could say that z=27-3x-4y.
Please be more specific with your question to get an answer. Are you asking how to, when to, where to, etc. use results and date to solve a problem?
it can be solve by if we can enhance to use more and more natural resources and decrease the chemical things which can pollute our enviroment
how does the owner of a factory which uses coal, solve the problem of sending more dioxide.Into the atmosphere
Yes can try but you have to be more specific as what the problem is with your computer
There are many reasons for using a computer in banking - but, basically computers handle calculations more quickly and more accurately than humans do.
Unless you give more details to your problem, we cannot answer this accurately.
That is a debatable assertion. An experiment is performed to answer a question. If getting the answer to a question is a problem, then yes, experiments solve problems. But it is more likely that the actual problem (whatever it may be) will be solved using the information which is obtained experimentally. For example, the crops are not growing well. We experimentally grow plants under a hundred different circumstances - more nitrogen, more light, more water, less water, etc., and we discover that the plants do better with more magnesium. Now we can solve the crop problem by fertilizing with magnesium. So the experiment did not solve the problem but it did tell us how to solve the problem.