They are both good, it's more about the user and their workflow than the software.
Cubase is better for the beginner. ProTools is not considered a "home" recording solutions. Try the simpler version of Cubase, Cubase Essentials.
That question is difficult to answer. If you a band looking to record your next album, you would probably use ProTools (or Cubase, or Logic, or Digital Performer, or Sonar). If you are a DJ-style beat composer, you would use Fruity Loops (or Reason, or Ableton Live). They are very different programs for different types of composers.
Nope. Though, there are many other options for windows that are equally as powerful music creation and editing tools (Cubase, ProTools, etc.) Sorry. ):
well my advice is logic studio !!! maybe protools !! cubase,logic stuio,pro tools,ableton live,mixing,mastering tutorials !! http://musicproductionvideos.blogspot.com/
Totally matter of preference. I prefer coffee over tea.
��� Live recording functionality amd workflow is optimised in Cubase ��� Audio editing equivalent to midi manipulation within Cubase ��� Professional scoring capabilities not found within FL ��� Yamaha hardware integration in Cubase especially the professional mixing desk range ��� Cubase has the ability to export in OMF protocol to Pro Tools. FL studio itself can actually be used as a VST plugin within Cubase
Most people nowadays use a computer and one or more of the following programs: Ableton, FL Studio, Reason, Reaper, Protools, Cubase, Logic, Sound Forge...
There are currently no FREE Digital Audio Workstation programs for Windows with the power and capabilities of commercial software such as Cubase, ProTools and Sonar. There are many free audio editors such as Audacity, but these are not considered DAWs.
He used Protools but moved to Pro Logic 9 :) Its better for his workflow
You can get Cubase from Steinbergs website
On the Cubase Wiki, you can find information about Cubase software features, updates, tutorials, troubleshooting tips, and user guides.
With Cubase.