In software development, these relationships you're trying to make are almost certainly never going to be one-to-one. Without knowing more about your project, I'd say your best bet would be to start by systematically separating your project into sections and to developing the requirements lists around each of those modules.
For each section, once you've got requirements lists drawn out, go through each and decide where (if any) there are any conflicts or dependencies between and within the lists, even if they are minor. Document each extensively, on *both* sides of the conflict/dependency. Redundancy is okay here.
If you need something to present to bosses/professors, displaying the functional and non-functional key points in two columns for each section with directional conflict/dependency arrows between each should be sufficiently simple.
The CEO is ultimately responsible for everything that happens within a company.
Physical
physical layer
Site engineer is responsible for the implementation of design drawings in accordance with the statement of work and specification.
Board of Governors
According to AR 25-2, the IASO is responsible for enforcing policy guidance and training requirements.
Wing commander
loan officer
test
Confucius was a philosopher known for his emphasis on responsible relationships and respect for parents. He believed in the importance of family and social harmony, advocating for ethical behavior and fulfilling one's responsibilities towards others.
Requirements Managers are responsible for defining, documenting, and managing the requirements of a project or product throughout its lifecycle. They ensure that all stakeholders' needs are captured and communicated effectively, facilitating clear understanding and alignment. Additionally, they prioritize requirements, track changes, and help to resolve conflicts, ensuring that the final deliverable meets the intended objectives and quality standards.
The US government