false
In a client-server network, nodes do not communicate directly with each other; instead, they interact through a central server. Clients send requests to the server, which processes those requests and sends back responses. This architecture centralizes resource management and simplifies data handling, enhancing security and efficiency. In contrast, a peer-to-peer network allows direct communication between nodes without a central server.
Star
NOS or "Network operating systems."
If we focus on sharing documents - True.
C. Server
A client-server network better than a peer-to-peer network because it allows centralized control. This includes centralized user management and enforcement of centralized security measures.
I am sorry. I am trying to think of how to answer your question however I really do not know what you are asking here.
Client/Server networks provide more security than typically needed for a home network.
The network is there to enable clients to communicate with one another. What the clients do is up to the users or service providers.
In a server-client network architecture, devices called clients connect to a central server. The server manages and coordinates communication between clients, allowing them to exchange data and information. This architecture enables efficient and organized communication by centralizing resources and providing a structured framework for devices to interact within a network.
Computers that collect information from all the clients on a network have configuration management software installed. An administrator of a computer network would also be able to collect all information from clients.
Client/server computing, as opposed to Peer to Peer computing, is when there is a directory server present on the network, such as Windows Server 200x, LDAP, Novell eDirectory, or an equivelant. This server acts as a central authority for computers on the network.