FCFS is "First come, first served" Scheduling: Processes are given time on the CPU in the order that they arrive. eg: Process | Arrival Time (ns) | Burst Time (ns) P1 0 20 P2 0 10 P3 0 5 Scheduling Diagram for FCFS: | P1 | P2 | P3 | 0ns 20ns 30ns 35ns
The circular queue data structure is required to implement the round robin scheduling policy. Round robin is similar to FCFS scheduling.
By far the simplest CPU-scheduling algorithm is the first-come, first-served (FCFS) scheduling algorithm. With this scheme, the process that requests the CPU first is allocated the CPU first. The implementation of the FCFS policy is easily managed with a FIFO queue. When a process enters the ready queue, its PCB is linked onto the tail of the queue. When the CPU is free, it is allocated to the process at the head of the queue. The running process is then removed from the queue. The code for FCFS scheduling is simple to write and understand. The average waiting time under the FCFS policy, however, is often quite long. Consider the following set of processes that arrive at time 0, with the length of the CPU-burst time given in milliseconds:
in fcfs scheduling there is a shortcoming that is if any rocess of maximum brust time is first ome. and after that many short burst time process come. then smaller pocesses have to wait for a long time untill the max brust time process complete their execution. in case of shortest job first it applied the method to give shortest t\burst time job to processer first.
akkar bakkar bambe bo
It is the most simple scheduling algorithmn It is easy to implement in software If the processes are of varied length then it becomes slow.
Information concerning the client can be easily updated. June 1, 2008 NLE
adv. Reduced No-shows, Client convenience, Professional system without the cost
this is my doubt about the non-preemptive priority scheduling. i m doing bachelor of engineering in IT and this question in end semester exam. the question is as follows:Assume you have the following jobs to be executed with one processor, with the jobs arriving in the order listed here:Process Burst Time PriorityP1 80 5P2 20 1P3 10 3P4 20 2P5 50 4Suppose the system uses priority scheduling. Draw Gantt chart and calculate average waiting time for the processes.My doubt is:suppose if we were to use non-preemptive priority scheduling, the question says the jobs arriving in the order listed, so as per the order P1 will arrive first so it will get the CPU first and in non-preemptive once a job gets CPU it will not leave CPU till the process finishes, then as per the order P2 will come and same thing repeats.... so it acts like FCFS scheduling and priority is of no use here. But my lecturer says we have to follow the priority and P2 will come first, but the line the jobs arriving in the order listed is still not letting me agree with my lecturer. Can anyone help out?
First-come, first-served (FCFS) - sometimes first-in, first-served and first-come, first choice - is a service policy whereby the requests of customers or clients are attended to in the order that they arrived, without other biases or preferences. The policy can be employed when processing sales orders, in determining restaurant seating, on a taxi stand, etc. In Western society, it is the standard policy for the processing of most queues in which people wait for a service or two.
Manual scheduling allows for greater flexibility and personalization, enabling individuals to adjust plans based on immediate needs and preferences. It often fosters a deeper understanding of tasks and priorities, as one engages directly with the scheduling process. Additionally, manual scheduling can reduce reliance on technology, making it accessible to those who may not be comfortable with digital tools. Lastly, it encourages mindfulness and intentionality in time management.
Advantages of Priority Scheduling-1.Simplicity.2.Reasonable support for priority.3.Suitable for applications with varying time and resource requirements.Disadvantages of Priority Scheduling-1.Indefinite blocking or starvation.2.A priority scheduling can leave some low priority waiting processes indefinitely for CPU.3.If the system eventually crashes then all unfinished low priority processes gets lost.