0
Looks like Binary, which is basically your computer using 1's and 0's to represent letters and numbers. The first string you have there 1011010 is the binary representation for the letter Z... the second one, looks like it has an extra character in there so it could be any number of letters.
What else can I help you with?
Add the binary numbers 1010110 and 1011010?
1010110= 86 1011010= 90
What is 10101010 10101010 equals?
337
What is 10101010 in hexadecimal?
10101010 in decimal = 9A2112 in Hex.
step to add binary numbers 1010110 and 1011010?
To add paired numbers 1010110 and 1011010, you can follow these means: Begin by adjusting the two numbers upward, putting the digits in comparing sections: 1010110 1011010 Start adding the furthest right digits (the most un-huge pieces), which are 0 and 0 for this situation. Compose the total underneath the section: 1010110 1011010 000 Move to the following segment to one side and add the digits, considering any convey from the past section: 1010110 1011010 0 000 The amount of 1 and 1 is 0, and there are no convey digits. Proceed with this interaction for every section, working from right to left: 1010110 1011010 1100100 Whenever you have added every one of the segments, you will have the amount of the double numbers: 1010110 1011010 1100100 In this way, the amount of 1010110 and 1011010 in double is 1100100.
What is the sum of 10101010 and 01111?
In any base other than 2 (ie other than binary): 10101010 + 01111 = 10102121 In base 2 (binary): 10101010 + 01111 = 10111001
What is the sum of binary formats 10101010 and 01111 is?
10101010 + 01111 = 10111001 (170+15 = 185)
How do you write 10101010 using exponents?
10101010 = 10^7 + 10^5 + 10^3 + 10.
What is the answer for 10101010 plus 00101000?
100000100000
What is 10101010 plus 90909090?
101010100
What is the binary equivalent to 170?
10101010
How do you write the number 90 in binary?
90 = 1011010 (or 5A in hexadecimal).
What is the same thing as 10101010?
The binary number 10101010 is equivalent, in decimal representation, to 128 + 32 + 8 + 2 = 170. But this answer assumes that the given number is binary - an assumption for which there is no real justification. Besides, the relationship is an equivalence, which is not quite "the same thing".
