Pompeii worms have a symbiotic relationship with thermophile bacteria that live in their tissues. The bacteria provide nutrients to the worms through chemosynthesis, converting chemicals from hydrothermal vents into usable energy. In return, the worms provide a habitat and protection for the bacteria.
Which do you think is morally wrong between the worms and viruses?
Meek mill is the answer
Worms are invertebrates while humans are vertebrate.
The immature herring gets eaten by the arrow worm, then the adult herring eats the arrow worm.
One lives in water and the other in soil
There is no symbiosis between a flea and a dog. The flea is a blood eating parasite on the dog. There is benefit to the flea but not to the dog so there is no symbiosis.
Yes, tube worms and certain bacteria engage in a mutualistic relationship. The bacteria, often chemosynthetic, convert hydrogen sulfide from hydrothermal vents into organic compounds, providing nutrients for the tube worms. In return, the tube worms offer a stable habitat and access to these bacteria, facilitating their growth and reproduction. This symbiotic relationship is crucial for the survival of both organisms in extreme environments.
There are between 10 and 20 phyla that are considered 'worms' It is such a general word...Need way more specificity, like flat worm, flukes, round worms, ribbon worms, horsehair worms...etc....
worms do not have backs,There belly is a big ball in side of them
Worms and ants are more closely related than worms and spiders. This is because worms (which are annelids) and ants (which are insects) are both part of the larger group of arthropods and share a more recent common ancestor. In contrast, spiders belong to a different phylum (arachnids) and have a more distant evolutionary relationship with worms.
They are eating the dead worms parts. - Savannah