answersLogoWhite

0

It is permissible to direct a contractor to perform a task outside the contract's scope of work when both parties agree to the change, typically through a written change order or amendment. This ensures that the contractor is compensated appropriately for the additional work and that there is clarity on the expectations. Additionally, the change should not significantly alter the project's original intent or objectives. Always consult the contract terms for any specific procedures regarding modifications.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

1mo ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is it permissible for me to use someone else's direct deposit information?

No, it is not permissible to use someone else's direct deposit information without their permission.


Is it permissible for me to use someone else's bank account for direct deposit?

No, it is not permissible to use someone else's bank account for direct deposit without their permission.


Is it permissible to use someone else's bank account for direct deposit?

No, it is not permissible to use someone else's bank account for direct deposit without their permission.


Is a person a subcontractor if the general contractor makes the price?

Anyone who does work for a general contractor and is not a direct employee of that contractor is a sub-contractor. Regardless of who sets the price. The subcontractors work within the contract set between the general contractor and homeowner. Hence sub-contractor.


What is the opposite of perform?

THE opposite of perform is direct


How do you get a general contractor license in ca?

In California, you apply for a contractor's license from the Contractor's State License Board. There is a written examination and fees required. You can use the free website "California Contractor Licenses Directory" to access a direct link to California's Licensing website including a search of existing contractor licenses.


Is Guardian Life Insurance Company a non direct recognition company?

Guardian Life offers direct recognition contracts


Can a business who hires a company for contract work and then helps their employees it has hired go into business in direct competition on same job be held liable?

Depends on the Contract. Alot of subcontractor contracts prevent this. If the Prime contractor has received an estimate from a subcontractor and the subcontractor is working at the site or project under a estimate or purchase order then yes, the Prime contractor can be held liable for all monies under the contract if the subcontractor can prove that the employees were on their payroll and during this project the Prime contractor solicited Sub employees to become independent contractors.


When perform direct wet mount?

it is anpescible amilia?


What is a Collateral Contract?

A collateral contract is a contract which assigns the rights and/or obligations of an existing contract to a third party. Due to the doctrine of "privacy of contract" only those parties mentioned in a contract have rights and obligations and it is illegal to assign these rights and obligations to third parties without the consent of the other parties to the main contract. Collateral contracts overcome the privacy of contract doctrine. Collateral contracts are used in the construction industry to make a direct contractual relationship between clients and sub-contractors. In the collateral contract the client will promise to pay the sub-contractor for the works that the main contractor promised the client to undertake. This collateral contract comes in handy when the main contractor goes insolvent or has late payments or, more importantly, when the subcontractor's performance is substandard.


What are the difference between direct subcontractor and nominated subcontractor?

a nominated subcontractor, with various provisions for obtaining indemnities by the subcontractor (or Employer) but under the main contractor responsibility and coordination, or ** another contractor, which FIDIC provides the incumbent Main Contractor is required to give site access, etc, etc to but coordinated by the Employer My own understanding, very simply put is that a nominated subcontractor is actually a "normal" subcontract between Main Contractor and Subcontractor, BUT that the nominated subcontractor is selected by the Employer and price agreed with the Employer directly. That would mean that the Main Contractor has the accountability for the subcontractor, notwithstanding any indemnities. The Consultant has stated today that in their opinion: ** the nominated subcontractor is selected by the Employer and signs a contract direct with the Employer ** the Employer will secure assurances, bonds / performance sureties and warranties direct with the subcontractor, and ** that the Main Contractor DOES NOT sign a subcontract with the subcontractor ** that the main Contractor will not be held liable for certain specified warranties My understanding is that the Main Contractor still should sign a subcontract with the nominated subcontractor and assumes the responsibilities of a Main Contractor over the Subcontractor - though the Employer states that the Main Contractor has no liability specified warranty issues and quality (only). I would believe the Main Contractor still has a number of responsibilities in respect of the subcontractor and their general performance. The Consultant assures they have checked FIDIC and it is normal for the Employer to sign a subcontract direct with the Nominated Subcontractor. I would believe in that case it is not a "Nominated Subcontract", but instead a direct supplementary contract between the Employer and their Contractor (secondary contractor) Can you kindly advise quite simply, the contractual position of a nominated subcontract under FIDIC ...... ie does the Employer sign the contract / subcontract with the Nominated Subcontractor, or is it a subcontract between Main Contractor and Nominated Subcontractor with the normal (in general terms) obligations by the Main Contractor for the Subcontractor, to the Employer.


Can a principal contractor be vicariously liable for the actions of his subcontractor?

Yes, a principal contractor can be vicariously liable for the actions of his subcontractor if the subcontractor is found to be an agent of the principal contractor. This typically occurs if the subcontractor is under the direct control or supervision of the principal contractor in carrying out the work.