Instead of buying an i5-750, you should consider buying a more energy
efficient Xeon X3323:
Much more l2 cache 6 MB vs 1 MB 6x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much lower typical power consumption 65W vs 122.45W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Much more l2 cache per core 1.5 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 6x more l2 cache per core
Much lower annual home energy cost 19.27 $/year vs 42.81 $/year 2.2x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 70.08 $/year vs 122.73 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Better performance per watt 1.67 pt/W vs 0.89 pt/W More than 85% better performance per watt
Light emitting diodes (LEDs) are considered the most efficient light source in terms of lumens per watt. They can produce significantly more lumens per watt compared to traditional incandescent or fluorescent bulbs, making them an energy-efficient lighting option for various applications.
Incandescent produces about 10 lumens of light per watt of electricity Halogen produces about 13 lumens per watt Fluorescent and CFL produce about 50 lumens per watt So Fluorescent is the most efficient.
161 lumens I believe the above answer to be inaccurate. It depends on the light source. For example: For an incandescent light bulb 1 watt it is approx. 18 Lumens. However most LED's use only about 10% the wattage to produce the same amount of light. So for LED's .1 watt produces 18 Lumens.
Light bulbs always use energy. Therefore to save energy they should be switched off. But certain types of bulb use much less energy than others: Incandescent: 10 lumens per watt Halogen: 13 lumens per watt Fluorescent: 50-60 lumens per watt (cheap to buy) LED: 50-70 lumens per watt (expensive to buy)
LEDs don't use any power, or they are at least 10 times more efficient than any other kind of lighting. LEDs are about 15 percent more efficient than fluorescent lights, and six times as efficient as incandescent - and rapidly improving. LEDs are on an impressive development path. In just the past year, we have seen commercially available dies move from 65 lumens per watt to over 90 lumens per watt. Within the next five to seven years, there seems to be a clear path past 150 lumens per watt and a reasonable expectation of approaching 200 lumens per watt. represents a tremendous opportunity to provide a real alternative to fluorescent lighting. Note that these LED efficiencies then need to be combined with power conversion circuitry efficiencies, optical efficiencies, etc., to come up with a total LED lighting system efficacy. For example, a product using a 90 lumens per watt LED may have a total system efficiency of 60 lumens per watt when everything is accounted for. Unfortunately, it is common today to find an LED product advertising well over 100 lumens per watt, leading to buyer disappointment.
Watt is a unit of power, not a unit of energy. Joule is the SI unit for energy; Watt means Joule/second. So, the "per time unit" is already implied. Saying "watt per second" or "watt per hour" would be completely wrong. The power is simply "900 Watt".
Incandescents produce 10 lumens per watt, halogens about 13 lumens per watt, fluorescents and LEDs 40-50 lumens per watt. Lumens measure the brightness, watts measure the speed at which electrical energy is used.
1800lumens per watt
One joule per second equates to:One watt or,0.00134 electric horsepower or,3.412 BTUs per hour.
1 watt per square foot
The most efficient cargo vans will get about 20 miles per gallon on the highway and 15 miles per gallon for city driving. The most efficient cargo van is the Chevrolet Express.
With current (as of 2013) technology, from best to worst efficiency, the light bulbs are basically:LED light bulbs (most efficient)Fluorescent lightsThe old-fashioned incandescent lights (worst)