nVidia by far. But it depends.
If your looking for game play then get your self a nVidia card.
An update for a program to fix issues with NVIDIA cards will not have any effect with Intel graphics. You cannot use NVIDIA-specific programs on your Intel card.
No you must have a Nvidia Graphics card/mother board / or cpu...
The competitors for the Intel GMA 950 graphics chipset are Nvidia and ATi Integrated onboard graphics chips and the Intel HD 4000 and X4500. Desktop cards do not compete with integrated.
In my opinion, the GeForce2 MX is better. I haven't actually looked up the specs but since NVIDIA is a graphics company, I'd say that their MX is better than Intel's integrated graphics.
no
Eh, Dude!! Go with Nvidia 8400m as there is no need to think over it. If you really wanna know why am I saying this then click the link below. It is my whole year experience with Intel X3100 : http://lnk.in/X3100 {if you can't click then paste the code in address bar}.
The NVidia is faster.
amd radeon is the best compare to nvidia
yes
The minimum requirements for graphics cards to run Second Life using windows xp are : NVIDIA GeForce 6600 or better ATI Radeon 8500, 9250 or better Intel 945 chipset For windows vista and windows 7 the following are required : NVIDIA GeForce 6600 or better ATI Radeon 9500 or better Intel 945 chipset Linden Lab recommends more powerful graphics cards to get the best experience out of the Second Life grid.
ATI/AMD 6370m, 6450m, 5470m, mobility 4570 & 3670. Nvidia 410m, GT 320m, 220m, 120m, are a little better, most ddr2 cards like 9600m GS, 9500m GS, 8600m GT etc are worse.
quadro fx 6800 is way too old