Jordan
Sir Chance Jungling for the South and Brad Rollings for the North.
For the North, Sherman, with the highly-rated McPherson as one of his subordinate commanders, killed at Atlanta. For the South, John Bell Hood.
There were several commanders or generals for the North during the Civil War. Some of the top commanders included Ulysses S. Grant, George McClellan, Robert Anderson, and George Custer.
Micheal Montgomery
Micheal Montgomery
The South's strategy during the Civil War was to get Great Britian's support. >The South's strategy was to use the great military leaders and commanders they had in order to defeat the North. With the North having multiple advantages, the South used their strongest factor: military training.
Other way round. The Confederates had attracted some of the best officers away from the US Army, while the North was struggling to find successful commanders. (One reason for Lee's early success was that he was facing Union Generals who were not in his league.) The only endemic trouble with the Southern Generals was their eternal feuding.
South to north
On average, commanders from the North, particularly those who graduated from West Point, tended to perform better during the Civil War than their Southern counterparts. Northern commanders benefited from a larger pool of resources, manpower, and industrial capabilities. Additionally, many key Northern leaders had more extensive military training and experience, which contributed to their effectiveness in battle. However, it's important to note that individual performance varied widely, and some Southern commanders, like Robert E. Lee, also achieved significant successes despite the odds.
South to North.
South to North
South