Interpreters
Interpreters
in my personal point of view i would say a parser is more like "one-directional" "automatic" vs. an interpreter, the interpreter has more "intelligence"
They are not programming languages and do not create programs, so they don't need a compiler. A browser opens a web page and reads the HTML or XHTML and displays it, more like an interpreter would.
Well , in computer terminology an interpreter is a translator which translates a source code line by line and executes it, while a translator is a big word it may have different types like compiler, interpreter, assembler etc. Answer In more specific language terms, an interpreter is a person who translates one language to another, for instance at the UN, where quick-wittedness and a good memory are attributes, whereas a translator converts a written work from from one language to another, where being methodical and having good research material to hand are advantages.
Neither one will be categorically "better" than the other. In general, compilers produce more efficient programs, while interpreters produce more reusable code (platform independence).
Basically they do the same: converting from one level of language into another. A compiler converts high level language (programming language like java) into machine-language. That is language a computer understands. An interpreter converts high level language into an intermediate level. When a program is exectuted, that intermediate level is reconverted to machine language.
i had the problem too...my hp phone memory is full but my memory card still have more space..
An interpreter is a computer program that executes the instructions written in a high level programming language. It can also preform the translation of a high level language to equivalent machine level code. But unlike compiler, an interpreter will compile the code line by line, i.e. each line will be translated to machine level language.Read more: What_ias_computer_interpreter
when you increase memory you have more space on computers and greater memory with have more impact than lower memory
1GB memory card has more space. The capacity of the memory cards are various, such as, 16MB 32MB. There are lots of memory cards on this website: http://www.dinodirect.com/Wii-Accessories/Wii-Memory-Cards/ You can have a look.
Programming languages don't actually require any memory as such. A programming language is nothing more than a specification that determines how source code needs to be composed in order to be translated into machine code. That specification could easily be defined in a book which obviously requires no memory. These days, however, language documentation is generally available online, so the amount of memory required is usually limited only to the page or pages you're currently reading (excluding the memory required by your Internet browser or document reader of course). However, aside from the language documentation, a programming language also requires a compiler and/or interpreter to perform the physical translation from source code to machine code. A compiler is only required during compilation; once code is compiled to machine code or byte code the compiler is no longer required. However, non-compiled programming languages or languages that only compile to byte code have to be interpreted and the interpreter must remain in memory in order to execute the code. Java is a typical example because code is compiled to byte code suitable for interpretation by the Java virtual machine. The actual amount of memory required by the compiler or interpreter will vary from language to language and even from implementation to implementation of the same language. For instance, the gcc compiler and the Microsoft Visual C++ compiler both compile C++ code, but the implementations are completely different and are unlikely to consume the same amount of memory. Moreover, gcc for the Mac and gcc for the PC are completely different implementations of the same implementation! Language implementations also generally provide additional tools including debuggers, resource managers, code editors and so on. Many also provide an integrated development environment to bring all the tools together. These tools are not strictly part of the language specification, but they do consume memory. Unfortunately, there is no way to generalise the amount of memory physically required by any development environment as it all depends on the tools you use.
when you increase memory you have more space on computers and greater memory with have more impact than lower memory