RAID 5 is more fault tolerant than RAID 0 and RAID 1 because it uses striping with distributed parity, allowing it to withstand the failure of one drive without data loss. In contrast, RAID 0 offers no redundancy, meaning that the failure of any single drive results in total data loss, while RAID 1 provides redundancy through mirroring but requires twice the storage capacity. Therefore, RAID 5 strikes a balance between improved performance and efficient storage utilization while still providing a level of protection against drive failures.
Fault tolerance is the ability of a system to continue working even when a fault exists. In the case of RAID, which stands for Redundant Array of Inexpensive Discs, fault tolerance is provided by having data recorded on more than one drive, and also by having more than one power supply. Note that RAID 0 is not fault telerant because it is simply stripes the data to increase size and bandwidth, but provides no redundancy. RAID 1 and RAID 5 are fault tolerant, to various levels.
Windows XP supports spanned and striped RAID 0 volumes Hardware RAID is considered a better solution for fault tolerance than software RAID RAID 0 does not provide fault tolerance
NO! That's the whole idea of the Distributed in DFS. Having 'more than one' Servers is what gives you the fault tolerance!
Raid implemented by Hardware is more stable than RAID implemented by Windows
The comparative form of "tolerant" is "more tolerant," and the superlative form is "most tolerant." These forms are used to compare levels of tolerance between two or more subjects. For example, you might say, "She is more tolerant than her brother," or "He is the most tolerant person in the group."
The comparative form of "tolerant" is "more tolerant." This form is used when comparing the levels of tolerance between two subjects. For example, you might say, "She is more tolerant than her brother."
RAID 6 provides the most fault tolerance of any standard RAID disk arrays (RAID 0, 1 , 5, 6, and RAID 10). If any two disks in a RAID 6 array fail and are removed, then two new blank disks can be installed and no data has been lost. RAID 1+1 or most other "layered" RAID systems can provide more fault tolerance than RAID 6, tolerating the failure of any 3 disks. Some experimental non-standard disk arrays can provide more fault tolerance with less overhead, such as the parchive system. Nearly all distributed file systems and distributed version control systems can be set up so that if one machine is completely destroyed by fire, all the data can be recovered from a backup machine in another building.
Every RAID level stripes data across multiple drives, which improves performance compared to using a single disk. RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 1+0, RAID 5, RAID 6, etc. all have better performance than a single disk. Other than RAID 0, all other RAID levels provide fault tolerance. RAID 1, RAID 1+0, RAID 5, RAID 6, etc. all have fault tolerance.
its not
It means that data is split up among 2 or more hard disks, WITHOUT fault tolerance. This increases data transfer speed, but unlike other types of RAID, since more than one hard disk is used, it will INCREASE the risk for the data, in case something happens to the hard disks.
because the middle colonies had milder climate than the new england
No. No creature is impervious to radiation. However, some insects are more tolerant of radiation than humans are.