Don't you mean a y10k bug? In 999, there was a y1k scare, that it would usher in the apocalypse. Because computers didn't go kaput after 11:59PM 12/31/99, at least one soothesayer claimed it was because 2001 was doomsday, because that was when the new century/millenium began. But the whole basis of the bug was the restrictions to the last 2 digits of the year. This all seems to add up to obsessions w/ magic numbers, especially any event that occurrs only once every 15 lifetimes or so-namely the rollover of a new calendar millenium.
According to the experts at F-Secure, the "Y2K Virus" is just a misnomer given to the Y2K bug by media personnel who didn't completely understand the problem.
Probably a mis-spelling of the Y2K bug.
1999
The cast of Y2K Millennium Bug 2000 - 1994 includes: Axle Gunn as George Jason Vince as Jack
The Year 2000 problem (also known as the Y2K problem, the Millennium bug, the Y2K bug, or simply Y2K) was a problem for both digital (computer-related) and non-digital documentation and data storage situations that resulted from the practice of truncating a four-digit year to two digits. This made year 2000 indistinguishable from 1900. The former assumption that a twentieth-century date was always understood caused various errors concerning, in particular, the display of dates and the automated ordering of dated records or real-time events.
Y2K was based on the idea that outdated computers would fail to understand the year 2000. As the year 2000 is now over, no.
The Y2K bug was a computer programming issue that caused concern as the year 2000 approached. Many feared that computers would not be able to properly handle the change from 1999 to 2000, potentially causing widespread malfunctions. Significant efforts were made to update and fix systems to prevent major disruptions, and ultimately, the impact of the Y2K bug was minimal.
There is no evidence to suggest that anyone committed suicide specifically because of Y2K. While there was concern and anticipation about potential disruptions due to the Y2K bug, it did not lead to any widespread suicides.
No, it isn't. Though the Y2K bug posed some problems for computers and computer systems, it was largely headed off by thinking programmers and IT people. Those who understood the nature of the bug saw it as a minor inconvenience rather than a serious problem. If anyone was really scared over the situation, it is probable that their fears were borne out of ignorance. The proof is in the pudding. Does anyone recall with clarity the "big noise" about the bug and what really happened? Probably not many. Nothing much occurred. It was "no biggie" in the grand scheme of things, and it's that simple.
The Y2K bug was a significant event in the history of technology because it highlighted the potential consequences of programming errors and the importance of proper software testing and maintenance. It also led to increased awareness and investment in updating and modernizing computer systems to prevent similar issues in the future.
The Y2K bug was supposed to happen January 1, 2000. Many computer applications stored dates with only two digits for the year. For example, December 31, 1999, was stored as 12-31-99. The problem was that the following day, January 1, 2000, would be 01-01-00, which would appear to be before any other dates in the system, causing confusion and errors.
Quoted from what is y2k (also by me):"Y2K" refers to the "Year 2000 (2 k)". Since this is posted in computer history, I'll assume you're referring to it's effect on computers, or more specifically the "Y2K bug". This was a bug out of the fact that before 2000, computers assumed that years started with 19 e.g. 1985 or 1999. When 2000 came around, people just assumed that computers would glitch out with errors as "2000" doesn't fit into the 19__ form. This was attributed to anything that was relied on computers (car ignition systems, coffee makers, etc.). January 1st came and went, and this proved to be false. And life went on...This caused no major problems, and most programmers had switched their code to be "y2k" compatible anyway.Oh, and I didn't stop it, other people did