No, maximising throughput does not necessarily mean maximising turnaround time.
Throughput is a measure of how many operations can be performed in a period of time. Turnaround is a measure of how long it takes to perform an operation.
If you optimize latency and/or overhead, you can increase throughput and decrease turnaround time.
On the other hand, if you create parallel processing, you can increase throughput without decreasing turnaround.
One can find a business turnaround plan at Michigan Turnaround Plan's website. Additionaly, one can also find a turnaround plan at Hewlett-Packard, which would be run under Meg Whitman.
ADSL
A turnaround strategy for commercial banks would be canvassing the CASA accounts. CASA are low cost funds. With a CORE banking facility and utmost service the banks can get CASA good business.
Not necessarily. But if it would benefit others then I would do it.
yes
Not necessarily but it would be strange
The max distance of a 802.11n router is approximately 100 feet. This distance is usually considerably shorter in most homes due to interference.
ISP.
Under the Lean Thinking angle of view, Quality and Productivity are the 2 sides of the same medal. They go hand-in-hand. They are allied, not enemies. They are not antithetic.The lean philosophy targets at maximising both Quality and Productivity because it targets at maximising Value: Quality and Productivity are the 2 most essential ingredients of Value.Under the Lean philosophy, improving the one at the expenses of the other would be "handicapped".
If you mean a Clean Bill of Lading it is a document (or series of documents) that have no leins, restrictions or other encumbrances which would deny throughput entry into a foreign port of entry.
Not necessarily, but it would be very difficult.
Explain why a niche company might have an advantage in a market would price necessarily be an advantage explain why or why not