Slaves sometimes spat in their master's food as a form of resistance and a way to assert some control over their oppressive circumstances. This act was a silent protest against their mistreatment and a means of expressing their anger and resentment. It also served as a small act of defiance, allowing them to reclaim a sense of agency in a situation where they had little power. Such actions highlighted the deep-seated tensions and injustices within the institution of slavery.
by getting beat and not being feed food
the slaves master was pharaoh
they would clean , perpare food foor there master
slaves had a master because they needed them were there was good quality soil for large plantations
During the time of slavery, slaves referred to their master as "master" or "massa."
no geckos can not spit poison!
TBH, I think that slaves gain their master's because they get whipped and slapped if they don't do what they are asked by the master. I mean, a master might bribe the slave into believing and trusting him/her.
It depends on their master. if they had a kind master they would be treated alright, with enough food, water and shelter. But if they had an average mean master they would be beaten or whipped, starved, they would have to sleep on the floor or with the animals or outside.
Actually, it realy does not digest your food, it just help digest our food. Its SALAIVA
the slaves and the master
Captives are not allowed to hunt for food: after all, they might run away. They are completely dependent on their master or captors for all the essentials of life.
Two types of slaves in ancient Rome were household slaves who worked in the homes of their master, performing domestic duties, and agricultural slaves who worked in the fields and farms belonging to their master.