Of course it is. In the presence of violent abuse by a government, violent revolution is simply social self-defense.
He is a violent person.The violent storm showed no signs of stopping.There was a violent roar from behind him.
Violent behavior is never the answer, as it only leads to harm and destruction.
The battle in the war was violent. He thinks being violent is the answer to the problem, but it is not. The demonstration became a violent riot.
A chronic violent offender is someone who repeatedly engages in violent behavior over a period of time. These individuals often have a history of committing serious offenses and demonstrate a pattern of violent behavior that poses a continued threat to public safety.
DUI is not typically considered a violent crime in the same way as assault or robbery. However, driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs can lead to accidents causing bodily harm or death, which may be considered violent acts.
Communism requires a revolution where the workers violently overthrow the bourgeoisie and the capitalists. No other political form requires a violent revolution to be implemented.
The only rule that I have is to always be skeptical of questions that ask if something is always the case (as hypocritical as that rule is facially). I am further troubled by the use of the word "revolution" which can refer to a variety of very distinct activities, some peaceful and beneficial and others violent and destructive.I would say that peaceful avocation of global peace and security, human rights and communal dignity is almost always justifiable. When it starts becoming more violent, I find it far less justifiable and its justifiability usually has an indirect relationship with the level of violence.
The Romanian revolution was violent, and the Czech revolution was not.
Violent Revolution was created on 2001-09-25.
((apex)) .The Romanian Revolution was very violent. <3 Kelsmo:)
no
The EDSA Revolution in the Philippines refers to the peaceful demonstrations that led to the ousting of President Marcos in 1986. In contemporary times, it symbolizes the power of the people to come together and effect change peacefully, serving as a reminder of the importance of democracy and civil participation. It also inspires movements worldwide that seek to achieve social and political reforms through non-violent means.
Horrifically violent.
The Russian
The Romanian revolution was violent, and the Czech revolution was not.
The Romanian revolution was violent, and the Czech revolution was not.
The French revolution was very, very violent! Thousands of people were murdered in the most horrifying way.