how rajputs can be higher to anyone , these rajputs are historical pimps who gave thier daughters to mughals forthier lifes where as arains along with syeds , awans , alvis , and abbasis are pure arab blooded peoples
No.
Yes very higher
Both are equal . Raghav and Tanwar both share blood relation being Rajputs. Kindly don't ask such patriarchial or controversial questions . Promote Brotherhood rather than spreading hatred in terms of who is bigger or smaller. Raghav are Sooryavanshi Rajputs . Tanwar or Tomar are Puruvanshi Rajputs. It should also be kept in mind that Tanwar or Tomar surname is also commonly found among Jaats and Gurjars . So a person writing Tanwar or Tomar surname doesn't necessarily means he is a Rajput. Though this is not the case with Raghav Rajputs. Their population is relatively low as compared to Tomars. And their surname is generally not found in any other caste. JAI HIND.
Tonk Kashatriya is higher class people. Tonk is palace and kshatriya from Tonk are Tonk Kshatriya. Tonk Kshatriya people are Rajput families. The Kshatriya people pray to bitthal and Bhagat Namdev Ji were pray to bitthal. So Kshatriya from Tonk thay just called Tonk Kshatriya the Rajput.
DON't Know about 'Jaat parmara' as Jaat can'T be parmars at all...Jaat started using parmar surname during medival time,jaat used to take care of Animals of Hindu Rajput Raja..... All Rajput either that chandela or chauhan or anyone always higher than Jaat and Gurjars as Jaat and Gurjers arose during medival time, they used to work under Rajput kings ,since the time whoever they were working under ..they started using their surnames as their own... If u talk about Rajput .......Rajput Parmar is higher than chandela as Parmar has long and authentic history than chandela Rajputs.... chandela rajputs also ranks Good and it is also a very good n respected Rajput clan but Parmar Is higher than chandela..
If by "good" you mean higher than the answer is NO, kayasthas are a Higher and a literate and educated class of Kshatriyas, unlike rajputs who are "warrior Kshatrias" anyhow most kayasthas were Ministers and Advisers to Rajput kings owing to their antiquity as the educated gentry among Indian Castes.
Higher than Jatts
Ofcourse panwar as it has route to 'The royal parmar rajput dynasty''..as it has routes with parmar ,we all know that parmar had a huge and long kinngdom..the great raja bhoj,vikramaditya,and the great 'Ujjainiya' rajput Veer kunwar singh ji belongs to parmara dynasty....so jus becauze Panwar has its route with parmar and ujjainiya rajput.....so they hold a higher status than any rajputs ...
yes
Oh, dude, you're diving deep into the caste system! Uppal is actually a common surname among Rajputs, so it's more of a family name within that community rather than a sub-caste. But hey, labels, schmabels, right? Just be cool and treat everyone with respect, man.
The term "Parhar" is not a recognized Sikh caste. Sikhism does not have a caste system like Hinduism; instead, it emphasizes equality and rejects social hierarchies based on birth. Sikhs are encouraged to focus on their spiritual development and serving humanity rather than on caste distinctions. It is important to understand the principles of Sikhism and not categorize individuals based on caste labels.
Caste hierarchy can vary depending on regions and communities in India. In some regions, Jats might be considered higher caste than Sainis, while in others the hierarchy could be different. It's important to remember that caste distinctions are a social construct and not indicative of individual worth or capabilities.