answersLogoWhite

0

When Europeans took over Aboriginal land, it led to widespread displacement, violence, and cultural disruption for Indigenous peoples. Colonization often resulted in forced removal from traditional territories, introduction of diseases, and significant loss of life due to conflicts and lack of immunity to new illnesses. The imposition of European legal systems and land ownership concepts undermined Aboriginal cultures and practices, leading to long-lasting social, economic, and political challenges for Indigenous communities. This legacy continues to affect Aboriginal peoples today, contributing to struggles for rights, recognition, and reconciliation.

User Avatar

AnswerBot

6d ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Why were the aborigines killed by the Europeans?

the aboriginals fought with the European settlers because they europeans were taking over their land.


What happen to the Beothuk people?

Europeans were take over the land and the beothuk had to more in land


How did europeans modify their land?

they took over their land by fighting against the other countries


How did the Europeans gain control over the Native Americans?

The Europeans gained control over the Native Americans by taking their land and their important riches.


How many europeans fought to regain the holy land?

over 9000


How many europeans fought to regain holy land?

over 9000


What are Cherokee Indians mixed with after the Europeans took over their land?

They became mestizos.


Why was it hard for Europeans to get spices over land?

Because of bandits and the time it took.


Why did the Aboriginals help Canada with World War 1?

Aboriginals fought in WW1 because of their totality to the Queen . Their treaties were from the Queen and not the Canadian government. They volunteered to protect their families and their land. After all, it is their land more than anyone else's. The Aboriginals retained the warrior type spirit in spite of the governments desire to oppress them. They wanted to prove tgier loyality to Canada and each other.


How did American Indians attitudes about land use change after Europeans arrived?

They already had rivalries over land and resources


How were the trade networks constructed by the ming dynasty from those constructed by europeans?

Answer this question… The Ming dynasty operated trade networks primarily over land, while Europeans operated them over oceans.


How did the Aborigines react to the British?

When the Europeans came to Australia on the First Fleet in 1788, they claimed the land as unowned (or terra nullius- land of no-one in Latin), because they thought the Aboriginals were improper when they saw that they didn't live they way that they did ( growing crops and farming land, building houses having a currency etc.).In the journals of some Europeans that first came to Australia, Captain James Cook was the only one that saw the good in the indigenous Australians. At first, the Aboriginals were scared of the Europeans- they thought that they were devils with all their fancy clothes and harmful nature. Most of the people on the First Fleet described them as savages.The Europeans took all the land off the Aboriginals within minutes, claiming it as theirs when whereas they had only been there for a couple of minutes, the native Australians had been there for possibly more than 700,000 years before. The Europeans later on shot most of the Aboriginals that lived there because the Aboriginals believed in sharing, taking their cattle and crops- whereas the Europeans believed that people had to get even and pay for everything. They also ruined the indigenous sacred places by chopping down trees and clearing land for houses and other things.I can imagine that the Aboriginals must have felt pretty bad about this because it was very unfair.Fortunately, as the years have gone on and on, the white and black Australians have started repairing their relationship (e.g. when Kevin Rudd apologised for taking the Aboriginals' land in 2008).There are still Aboriginal tribes living in the Aussie bush today but not nearly as many as before 1788.