The community's preference to ignore people's differences can be justified as it fosters inclusivity and social cohesion, allowing individuals to connect on common ground rather than focusing on divisive traits. This approach can reduce prejudice and discrimination, promoting a more harmonious environment where everyone feels valued. Furthermore, by emphasizing shared values and experiences, communities can build stronger relationships and mutual support, ultimately enhancing overall well-being. However, it is essential to balance this with the recognition and appreciation of diversity to ensure all voices are heard and respected.
Germans had the right to conquer inferior peoples
That's sooo religious. NO.
NO. Imperialism and subjugation of other peoples is almost never justified. The crimes and atrocities that the US committed in Cuba and the Philippines are innumerable.
There are no differences with other European or North American peoples.
Europeans referred to Indigenous peoples of the Americas as "savages" largely due to their cultural differences and the Eurocentric belief in the superiority of European civilization. This label justified the colonization and exploitation of Indigenous lands and resources, as it framed these populations as primitive and in need of "civilizing." The term also reflected a broader narrative that dehumanized Indigenous peoples, allowing Europeans to rationalize their violent actions and the imposition of their own societal norms.
Preferences relevant to the trade off between peoples eagerness to consume now or to save for the future
It depends on different peoples preference's. personally i use the iPhone 5
the definition of revolution is a dramatic change in the way something works or is organized or in peoples ideas about it. the colonist decided to change the way they lived
Paleolithic peoples were divided based on their technologies, such as the Oldowan, Acheulean, and Mousterian tool industries. Additionally, differences were seen in their subsistence strategies, with some groups primarily hunter-gatherers while others practiced a mix of hunting, gathering, and limited agriculture. Social organization and artistic expression also varied among Paleolithic peoples.
The question is what can be called "mixing apples with oranges". The reason the question is poorly structured is that it asks the differences between a nation, the USA, and a religion, Islam. The USA has Islamic peoples, and Islamic peoples in Indonesia, the Middle East & Malaysia all have differences. There is no single "American religion" and there are no "Islamic" peoples that live in nations where Islam predominates that have the same cultures. In fact, in some European nations Islam is the predominate religion. Therefore there can be be no answer to this question.
they both wanted less government intervention in business and in peoples' lives.
The differences are there bone structure. They also became extinct differently.