In short, I think there is not much discussion, because it is a daunting, complex, philosophical, and highly personal issue. I think people are intimidated by it, because most of us are unsure of our beliefs to that level of specificity. I'll get into what I mean by that.
There's a great TED talk by the behavioral economist Dan Ariely discussing a paper by Johnson and Goldstein in which a study was done about people's attitudes about organ donation in several European nations.
Surprisingly, there were two obvious groups of countries: those with high (near 100%) participation in organ donation, and those with low (<30%) participation. One might expect this grouping to be due to cultural or religious differences between countries, but oddly, this doesn't seem to be the case. Countries that you would consider similar in many ways could be found in either group, irrespectively.
There was one factor that correlated strongly: the form at the DMV!
It turns out that the default choice on the form at each nation's respective licensing bureau strongly predicts what people pick!
Dan talks about how one might take the naive view that something that happens after you're dead is, by definition, inconsequential to your life, and that the cost associated with lifting the pen to change it is already more than any benefit could be worth.
The reason he says it's naive is because of course, the decision would have an effect on your life -- just not in any tangible way. You would know and feel something about how your body would be treated after your death. You would know and feel something about the future organ recipient you might be saving. This knowledge might affect your thinking, your mood, your outlook, and future decisions.
Okay, so it matters. Then why are people letting the DMV choose for them?
On to my personal opinion: there are lots of big scary philosophical quandaries out there... take the issue of abortion -- a very philosophical one for sure. In the States (where I'm from), you will rarely encounter a more polarizing issue. People certainly aren't nervous about picking sides in an abortion debate... so why is the philosophic about organ donation different?
I think that it's precisely BECAUSE organ donation participation will not affect you during life that people are so timid.
For example: with respect to an abortion situation, let's say mom wants one and dad doesn't. The "default" policy, whatever it is, will poignantly change life in a way that makes one of them profoundly unhappy in a real, tangible way. Either dad is forced to see a child he wants to have aborted, or mom has to have a child she doesn't think she can support or live happily with. Very real effects. These effects would immediately cause the unhappy parent to react to the current abortion policy, and soon the conversation snowballs into what we have today.
But organ donation is a personal choice that has no tangible effects until after you're dead. There's no strong impetus for polarized debate, because everyone can do what they want without stepping on anyone else's toes (or... fetuses). The consequences are purely theoretical for most individuals.
Organ donation involves the donation of the heart, liver, kidneys, etc. Tissue donation involves the donation of "non-organs," such as corneas, skin, bones, connective tissue, etc.
organ donation is the donation of biological tissue or organ of the human body,from a living or dead person who needs an organ and the card gives permission can give an organ
Most major religions, including Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, and Buddhism, support organ and tissue donation as a charitable act that saves lives and helps those in need. However, some sects or interpretations within these religions may have differing views. It's important for individuals to consult with their religious leaders if they have concerns about organ donation.
The requirement for hospitals to offer information about tissue and organ donation typically comes from national or regional regulatory bodies and organ procurement organizations. In the United States, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) mandates that hospitals have protocols in place for identifying potential donors and referring them to organ procurement organizations. Additionally, the Uniform Anatomical Gift Act provides a legal framework for organ and tissue donation. These regulations ensure that hospitals actively promote and facilitate donation opportunities.
As required by law; For cadaver, organ, eye, or tissue donation; and related to public health activities.
Not really, but there are slight differences. Organ farming is taking of the organ and organ donation is the giving side.
The National Organ Transplant Act (NOTA) and various state laws require hospitals to inform families about tissue and organ donation options when a loved one has died or is nearing death. These regulations are designed to ensure that families are aware of the possibility of donation, which can save lives and improve the quality of life for recipients. Additionally, hospitals often have protocols in place to facilitate this process and work in collaboration with organ procurement organizations.
Most major religions do not have a unified stance on organ and tissue donation, and perspectives can vary widely within each faith. Generally, many religious groups, including Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, view organ donation as an act of compassion and charity, supporting it as a means to save lives. However, some factions within these religions might express concerns about bodily integrity or the afterlife, leading to differing opinions. Ultimately, individual beliefs and interpretations play a significant role in how adherents approach organ donation.
One of the few consequences of HIV infection is that the infection can be transmitted by not only blood donation but also by any organ donation. Please do not think of organ or body donation.
With the help of organ donation, many people who are all at the death doors are able to continue their lives and also still some religion is opposing the organ donation and that is the main one and only disadvantage available in the organ donation process.
A tissue is an organ!
There is no legal restriction on cross-race organ donation. However, since organ tissue types are driven by genetics, it is unlikely that donors and recipients of different races would match.