This is a delicate question. If you remove smokers from being able to access public medical benefits, you then have to think "who else should be removed?". This could open up a Pandora's box. Should the public medical system help drug addicts, people who overeat, people who participate in dangerous activities such as skydiving or motorcross sports, people who drink alcohol and the list goes on.
According to the liberals in California, YES. And all their other medical bills, and their family's medical bills, food, housing and education.
Emesis is the medical term meaning vomiting.
Members of the community in The Giver are forced to take medication to suppress their sexual impulses in order to eliminate strong emotions and individual desires that could disrupt the harmony and stability of the society. By controlling these impulses, the community aims to maintain order, conformity, and predictability among its members.
They were forced to work or sacrificed
The elimination of an ethnic group from society through killing or forced migration is usually defined as ETHNIC CLEANSINGor GENOCIDE.
they banned smoking in public buildings so that non smokers wouldn't be forced to inhale the smoke (second hand smoke)
No, not in a free society.
when Katniss is forced to get waxed and she hates it. She is forced to put on a facade for the rest of society that she doesn't want to.
c.kill its members
Ethnic cleansing is when a society eliminates an ethnic group from it's society through killing or forced migration.
Insufficient information to answer. Forced by WHO? What kind of procedure? Why don't you want it?
Anglicanism has never been forced on the people, at certain times Catholicism has been forced, but there were a variety of Protestant Churches that people have neen allowed to join.