The question of whether GMOs should continue to be sold without labeling is contentious. Proponents argue that mandatory labeling could mislead consumers into thinking GMOs are unsafe, despite scientific consensus on their safety. Conversely, many consumers advocate for transparency, believing they have the right to know what is in their food. Ultimately, the decision should balance public health, consumer choice, and scientific evidence.
This way the customer knows how fresh it is and when it expires.
Um...no not really cuz if u have sex w/a chick then ur labeled as straight, do it w/ a dude, youre labeled as gay, do it w/both, then ur labeled as bi, the only way to not be labeled like that is to have sex with an animal which is beastiality
Not always. Cheeses should be labeled as pasteurised or unpasteurised to show if they have been treated or not.
If someone wants to overcome being labeled as shy they should try to be more social. But,I believe that people should be themselves regardless of the labels that may be assigned for whatever reason. The key is to not care.
A substance labeled as a catalyst is also known as a chemical agent that speeds up a reaction without being consumed in the process. Catalysts work by lowering the activation energy required for a reaction to occur and can be reused multiple times.
You choose what your style is. Does being labeled really matter though?
Yes, if the cereal is labeled as being kosher.
you can do architecture course being a commerce student. maths should be your one of the paper. without maths you can't do architecture
A 1992 Toyota Corolla can take any type of standard antifreeze. It should be labeled as being suitable for all makes and models of cars.
it didnt
The controversy surrounding Lars Andersen's archery techniques being labeled as fake is not entirely justified. There is more to his unique style that is being overlooked, such as his focus on historical archery methods and skills.
Not without the children, or being ordered to by the court.