It's arbitrary (and some chemicals are classed as both);
but in general organic contains carbon molecules and/or those related to life. It is the chemistry of carbon containing compounds.
Inorganic is everything else and generally do not contain carbon (with some exceptions).
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not.
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not.
nothing
Organic animals are living organisms that are composed of organic compounds, such as proteins, fats, and carbohydrates. Inorganic animals, however, do not exist as animals in the traditional sense, as animals are by definition organic beings. Inorganic substances can have animal-like structures or functions, but they are not considered animals.
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not (though there are some exceptions).
An organic molecule contains carbon, whereas an inorganic molecule does not.
one has "in" in the organic. therefore the inorganic is much heavy for the use of having "in" infront of "organic"
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not (though there are some exceptions).
Basically, organic compounds have carbon. Inorganic do not (though there are some exceptions).
The majority of an orange is organic, but it does contain some inorganic substances.
No. The difference between an organic and an inorganic compound, ionic or otherwise, is that an organic compound contains carbon bonded with hydrogen while an inorganic compound does not.
In general organic compounds / substances / materials contain carbon atoms bonded with other atoms and/or those related to life. It is the chemistry of carbon containing compounds. Inorganic is everything else and generally do not contain carbon (with some exceptions).