Dinosaurs were endotherms
Bacteria cells are prokaryotic, meaning they lack a nucleus and membrane-bound organelles, while mammal cells are eukaryotic with a defined nucleus and complex organelles. Bacteria have a cell wall made of peptidoglycan, whereas mammal cells do not have a cell wall. Additionally, bacteria often have plasmids, small circular DNA molecules, in addition to their chromosomal DNA, which mammal cells lack.
Yes. There were dinosaur fossils that have been discovered with red blood cells in it. The blood cells were still fresh
The ancestors of dinosaurs are bacteria. they would split and reproduce by itself and creating multiple cells until you had a larvae like dinosaur. Other scientists say either they started as the "Big bang" or molecular forms that grew. so technically there are no ancestors of dinosaurs only decendants
bacterial cells compare to the inside body to the sperm cell. other than that they do really compare to anything.
All living things have cells.
Cell theory is one of many subdivisions of scientific theory. Therefore, since cell theory IS scientific theory, I don't see how you can compare them. This is like saying compare mammals to squirrels.
The cells are too small for scientists to see with the naked eye. For some perspective on how small cells are, the dot above the letter 'i' is about the size of fifty cells. Scientists could not see regular cells with the eye alone.
In fat cells.
scientist get there cells from humans, plant and animals.
you take 3 compare and contrast bubbles and wright down the differences and the same
Yes they used the dinosaur DNA from fossilized mosquetos and the DNA from a toad, I think
What do scientists do to adult cells to make them behave like embryos?