"The Dragons of Peking" is considered a myth largely due to its lack of historical evidence and reliance on folklore. The tale often intertwines elements of Chinese culture, such as the significance of dragons as symbols of power and prosperity, leading to embellishments over time. Additionally, the absence of documented occurrences or credible sources supporting the existence of such dragons in Peking further cements its status as a myth rather than a factual account.
n
They are a myth.
Dragons are mythical. Their ability to smell or lack of it is dependant on the myth.
No. Dragons are from myth and do not exist so they do not live in Pennsylvania.
There are no laws concerning dragons, as most believe them to mere myth.
Dragons have never existed on this planet, thay are a myth. Unless you are counting Komodo dragons which are a species of lizard.
It depends on who you ask. Dragons may have existed as the early dinosaurs. King Arthure was real and he spoke of Dragons not to mention those huge skeletons found that scientists couldn't identifi. Ogres are a myth though.
No, not all Chinese believe in dragons. It is, after all, myth. Well, do YOU believe in faries?
dragons,legends, etc...
Umm bad news. Dragons aren't real (or if they are, no archaeologist has ever found a skeleton). All myth and folklore I'm afraid.
Peking, Beiping/Peiping, Yenching
The dragons of Greek mythology - giant, serpentine monsters with rows of sharp teeth; called Drakones.