Whether one needs guns for personal protection is a complex question that varies by individual circumstances, beliefs, and local laws. Some argue that firearms can provide a sense of security and a means of defense against threats, while others believe that non-lethal options and community safety measures are sufficient. Ultimately, the decision depends on factors such as the environment, personal comfort with firearms, and the effectiveness of other self-defense methods. It's important to consider the legal implications and responsibilities that come with gun ownership.
Guns don't need protecting. The ability to own without excessive governmental instrusion is what needs to be protected
You do not need to protect yourself from a duly elected president. The incumbent is there by the will of your fellow citizens.
So they can protect themselves from the other army. Plus, they don't always use guns.
No. People with guns protect homes.
You do not need the FBI's permission to own a firearm, you certainly do not need their permission to protect yourself from imminent danger. The 2nd Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America guaranty's your right to bare arms.
You don't need to. Dropbears do not exist.
You need to use a CPR mask with a one way valve to protect yourself.
a radiation suit
Yes. Of course. yes because it is for protecting yourself for purposely reasons. of course not for crimes.
If you find yourself in a situation where you feel physically threatened, you can't remove yourself from the situation, and you have no other alternative, do what you need to do to protect yourself.
You could stay indoors to protect yourself.
how can you protect yourself as therapist from inappropriate behaviourhide