yes because its for there living at there own risk. they might have a heritage tradition throughout there family ownings and some people cant afford to move out.
Vctorian landowners who live in high bushfire risk areas can apply to have the government buy their land.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act allowed people in certain areas to determine whether or not their territory would allow slavery
No they should not be allowed to do so. Because for example if the army is fighting against Islamic terrorists , and he converts to Islam , he could then betray the army.
No hunting areas are areas where you are not allowed to hunt.
Yes, in most municipalities they are allowed in residential areas.
National Parks
The completion of the railroad allowed for easier travel for goods and people. This allowed families to relocate to new areas, and for wider trade opportunities.
which areas on your subway restaurant are customers allowed to access
They only allowed blacks to buy housing in certain areas.
Yes. Places which are subject to long, hot, dry spells are more bushfire prone, particularly when there is an absence of humidity to balance the climate. Bushfires also need fuel, so areas where there is plenty of fuel by way of dry vegetation tend to be more prone. This is why southern Australia has the highest rate of bushfires.
Because those areas are dangerous and may flood
No. Rockhampton itself has not yet been struck by a major bushfire. However, fairly severe bushfires have hit west of Rockhampton, around the Mount Morgan region in September 2009, and this area seems more prone to fires than other areas, as it is so dry, and there is plenty of vegetation. See the related link for a map of the more bushfire-prone areas around Rockhampton. Generally, Queensland does not seem to experience severe bushfires like those in Victoria. Humidity is higher, the terrain is different, and vegetation is not as thick.