answersLogoWhite

0

When you intentionally set a fire to cause damage it is called arson.

User Avatar

Wiki User

10y ago

What else can I help you with?

Related Questions

Is it considered arson if the fire is intentionally set on your own property?

Yes, intentionally setting a fire on your own property can still be considered arson if it is done with the intent to cause damage or harm.


What do firemen call it when someone intentionally cause a fire?

Someone who intentionally causes a fire would be considered an arsonist.


Is it considered arson if you burn your own property?

Yes, it can still be considered arson if you intentionally set fire to your own property with the intent to cause damage or harm.


What damage can cause fire?

A lot of damage.. anyone knows what fires can do!!!


How Extensive damage to a vehicle is not a definitive indicator of an intentionally set fire due to?

Extensive damage to a vehicle may result from various factors, such as mechanical failure, accidents, or environmental conditions, rather than intentional arson. Additionally, the presence of certain fire patterns or residues can indicate accidental causes rather than deliberate ignition. Investigators must consider multiple elements, including witness accounts and the vehicle's history, before concluding that a fire was set intentionally. Thus, extensive damage alone cannot definitively determine the cause of a vehicle fire.


If your neighbor starts a fire that spreads to your yard and causes damage to your home is your neighbor's insurer responsible?

Unless they intentionally started the fire, they are not liable for your damages.


What damage does fire cause?

The damage that a fire can cause will vary depending on how fast it spreads. This may include causalities, fatalities, destruction of property, pollution of the environment and so much more.


How large of a fire usually causes fire damage?

Small fires will cause fire damage. However, it just depends on where the fire is at in the house. If it's in the living room, furniture can get damaged with fire places.


The principles of proximate cause?

Principles of Insurance : Proximate Cause The efficient cause which brings about a loss with no other intervening cause which breaks the chain of events. Example:Firemen remove undamaged stock from a burning building to avoid its involvement in the fire. It is stacked in the open yard and subsequently damaged by rain. Was the proximate cause of the damage the fire or the rain ? If the rain damage occurred before the Insured had an opportunity to protect it then the proximate cause of the damage would be the fire and fire is covered under a fire policy. However, if the stock was left unprotected for an unreasonably long period, the rain would be a new and independent cause of damage and damage caused by rain may not be covered under a policy.


What is the term for an intentionally set fire?

The term for an intentionally set fire is "arson." Arson involves deliberately causing a fire to damage property, endanger lives, or achieve other malicious goals. It is considered a criminal offense in many jurisdictions and can carry severe penalties.


How much damage can a fire tornado form?

A "fire tornado" is not a true tornado and is more properly called a firewhirl. Firewhirls can produce strong winds, but they usually are not strong enough to cause major damage. The main danger is that a firewhirl can spread fire to a new location. The fire can then potentially burn down entire neighborhoods.


Why is Extensive damage to a vehicle is not a definitive indicator of an intentionally set fire due to?

Extensive damage to a vehicle is not a definitive indicator of an intentionally set fire because such damage can also result from various factors, including accidental fires, mechanical failures, or environmental causes. Additionally, the severity of damage may vary based on the materials involved, the fire's duration, and the presence of accelerants. Investigative analysis is crucial to differentiate between intentional and unintentional fires, as visual damage alone cannot provide conclusive evidence of intent.