Texas' definition: "A person acts recklessly, or is reckless, with respect to circumstances surrounding his conduct or the result of his conduct when he is aware of but consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that the circumstances exist or the result will occur. The risk must be of such a nature and degree that its disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care that an ordinary person would exercise under all the circumstances as viewed from the actor's standpoint."
Other than a few artificial satellites, we are not aware of any substantial bodies orbiting around the moon.
In most cases the answer is no. However, a person can have a very mild seizure, which they are aware of and so they are aware of their surroundings. The seizure would not even be noticeable to anyone else.
can be careless sometimes
As with ALL things in 'life' I am sure there are instances of this occurring. HOWEVER, that is why there are trials and juries, so that the accused HAS the opportunity to present this defense. There are certain required states of mind that can lead to criminal punishment. There are two states of mind that may be related to carelessness as opposed to wilfulness that can lead to criminal charges in certain circumstances. Illinois law defines these as follows: 720 ILCS 5/4‑6) (from Ch. 38, par. 4‑6) Sec. 4‑6. Recklessness. A person is reckless or acts recklessly, when he consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk that circumstances exist or that a result will follow, described by the statute defining the offense; and such disregard constitutes a gross deviation from the standard of care which a reasonable person would exercise in the situation. An act performed recklessly is performed wantonly, within the meaning of a statute using the latter term, unless the statute clearly requires another meaning. (Source: Laws 1961, p. 1983.) (720 ILCS 5/4‑7) (from Ch. 38, par. 4‑7) Sec. 4‑7. Negligence. A person is negligent, or acts negligently, when he fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk that circumstances exist or a result will follow, described by the statute defining the offense; and such failure constitutes a substantial deviation from the standard of care which a reasonable person would exercise in the situation. (Source: Laws 1961, p. 1983.) For more information see the related links below.
Not that I am aware of.
You cannot force someone to become self-aware. A person needs to choose to become self-aware. The best way to become self-aware is to meditate.
No. Unless you were aware of it and that can be proven you were aware of it then you would be an accessory to identity fraud.
No. Not that I'm aware of.
Not that I am aware of but there is a singer guitarist called John Redbourne
No, but I am aware that some people follow others on Twitter.
Not that we are aware of.