No, not according to an Forbes article that states Chernobyl disaster (level 7 on International Nuclear and Radiological Event Scale) was magnitudes worse than the 2011 Fukushima nuclear disaster in Japan, which was a level 4 and likely be upgraded to a level 5.
The mysterious "Chernobyl beam of light" reported by eyewitnesses following the nuclear disaster was likely a result of the intense radiation released during the accident. This phenomenon was significant as it indicated the severity of the radiation levels and the widespread impact of the disaster on the surrounding environment.
"Chernobyl" is the Ukrainian word for a species of wormwood. Although Chernobyl is now known for the nuclear disaster which occurred there in 1986, the city was built and named back in the Middle Ages.
Europeans might be less likely than Americans to support nuclear power because of the events at Chernobyl in 1986. Large swaths of Europe were exposed to dangerous levels of radiation due to wind patterns.
Reactor designers try to anticipate every possible fault route and ensure the design is robust enough. Risks such as earthquakes and aircraft crashes are assessed. Earthquakes are particularly likely in some countries, Japan for example, and design will be aimed at ensuring the reactor primary circuit is strong enough to withstand the forecast forces developed, in an earthquake of an agreed level. Generally however accidents have been caused by non standard operations (Chernobyl), or poor instrumentation (Three Mile Island). Avoidance of accidents does require well thought out operating procedures, and staff well trained who can work out what is happening in an unusual event, combined with reliable instruments.
The Russian nuclear lab you might be referring to is likely the Mayak Production Association, also known as Chelyabinsk-40 or Chelyabinsk-65. It was involved in the production of plutonium for nuclear weapons during the Soviet era and has a history of nuclear accidents and environmental contamination.
Not very likely countries as are now getting rid of their nuclear weapons to aviod a nuclear war
no
global warming from car exhaust
Yes. The first use we developed for nuclear fission was the atomic bomb. The number of people who died when the bombs were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki is difficult to estimate precisely, but was likely over 200,000. Even aside from nuclear weapons, the products of nuclear fission are highly radioactive and fission itself produces large amount of radiation. Accidents at nuclear power plants, which use controlled fission reactions, can result in radioactive material being released into the environment.
The land in Chernobyl remains contaminated with high levels of radioactive materials from the 1986 nuclear disaster. This contamination has led to restrictions on human habitation and agricultural activities in the area. Efforts are ongoing to manage and mitigate the long-term impacts of the disaster on the land.
Nuclear energy is considered safe for the environment because it does not produce greenhouse gas emissions during electricity generation, unlike fossil fuels. It has a relatively small land footprint compared to renewable energy sources like wind or solar. Properly managed nuclear power plants have multiple layers of safety systems in place to prevent accidents and minimize any potential environmental impact.